My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE69651
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE69651
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:18:43 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:59:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/10/1983
Doc Name
WALSTRUM MINE ADEQUACY 3 MLRB 83-33
From
ENVIRONMENT INC
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iiiiiiiiii9 <br />Er~ulro~t, Ir~c. <br />LARRY E. 0~8RIAN JUN 1 0 1983 9989 WEST 80TH AVENUE <br />~11l~IDlMT ARVADA COLORADO 80004 <br />MINED LAND RcCLAMATION 3b3-423-7297 <br />Colo. Dept. of Natural Resources <br />Mr. Peter V O'Connor May 27, 1983 <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 423 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Walstrum Mine <br />Adequacy x 3 <br />MLRB No 83-33 <br />Dear Mr. O'Connor: <br />We respond to your April 21, 1983 letter in reference to this <br />mine. <br />B. Exhibit D - Mining Plan <br />2. Please find enclosed revised copies of Map Exhibits C, D-1, F <br />and J-1. These maps now reflect the results of the recently <br />completed certified boundary survey. You will note this is <br />essentially the same outline as originally submitted. The <br />exterior lines have been corrected for irregularities in this <br />particular section. The survey indicates these section lines vary <br />from the norm. Also enclosed is a copy of the revised legal <br />description. Total acreage has decreased from 130+/- acres to <br />approximately 116.48+/- acres. <br />As to your question about the affect on the drainage system, it <br />was our original thought that if we were to use the existing jeep <br />trail, we could cross the ravine at almost any place without <br />hurting existing conditions because the ravine is solid rock and <br />could hardly be damaged by our traffic. The new survey makes it <br />obvious that it is more desirable for us to build a completely <br />new access road at the outset. We have therefore abandoned any <br />intent to use the old jeep trail or cross the ravine. The access <br />road will start at U.S. 6 on the east side of the intermittent <br />creek and run to the northeast, as shown on the enclosed Map <br />Exhibit D-1. The operator expects the access road to be 35 feet <br />wide or less. <br />9. Thank you for clarifying your question. The statutes and <br />regulations you quote both refer to protecting the area outside <br />the affected land from slides or other damage, while you refer to <br />possible bench stability problems. A review of the mining plan <br />narrative and Map Exhibits D-1 and F shows that all bench areas <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.