My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE69629
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE69629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:18:42 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:59:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/28/2006
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 06 Geology and Overburden Assessment
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• (greeter then 70 feet) overburden strata. Magnesium also becomes the more dominant cation <br />es the overburden thickness increases. Potassium values ere about 50 percent higher in <br />the Volf Creek underburden compared to the Wedge area. Xangenese end acid base potential <br />values for Volf Creek underburden ere significantly less than the Wedge area. <br />Mean physiochemical values for each overburden end underburden parameter ere summarized in <br />Tables B and 9 for the entire Yoast study area. All mean values fall within the suitable <br />and marginally suitable ranges es outlined by the assessment criteria listed in Table 5. <br />Variability between the overburden end underburden sections is significant for the <br />dominant cation, particle size, and iron. Xagnesium is the dominant cation in the <br />underburden while calcium is dominant in the overburden. Sand content is 50 percent <br />higher and clay 50 percent lower in the underburden. Iron values ere twice as high in the <br />underburden compared to the overburden. <br /> Mixinc end Mitioetion of Unsuitable Overburden Material. Zones of unsuitable material <br /> <br /> were identified et all sample locations and are documented by parameter end sample <br /> interval in Appendix 6-3 Effective mitigation measures will include avoidance, <br />• ameliorating reclamation techniques, coal ext raetion, blending, dilution, and/or burial by <br /> normal overburden handling, sample contamination, end Laborator y error. These mitigative <br /> measures are also Listed in Appendix 6-3 and are discussed in further detail in Tab 21, <br />~~ Minesoil Reconstruction. <br /> i <br />ouelity Control and Duolicete Samples. quality control is an important part of the Yoast <br />soil end spoil monitoring program. One aspect of this quality control program is to have <br />the primary laboratory facility complete duplicate analyses on five to ten percent of the <br />total samples and on field-split blind samples. IML completed duplicated analyses on 6 of <br />the 58 Phase ]I samples. IML also completed duplicate analyses on four field-split blind <br />Phase 1[ samples. The duplicate analyses, presented on the enclosed laboratory reports in <br />Appendix b-2, were very comparable with the original samples. Variation between the <br />original end duplicate analyses date was not significant enough to change the suitability <br />classification of any sample. <br />Conclusions <br />• Overburden characteristics within the Yoast study area reflect the depositional <br /> environments of the coal-bearing strata of the Williams Fork Formation. There is minimal <br />31 Revised 03/01/95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.