Laserfiche WebLink
Underground Injection Control Branch Guidance No.: wy~yg://35/hup://www.epa.gov/reg5oh2duic/r5_OS.htm <br />'~ <br />_ ~ <br />The interpretation and confirmation of the SAPT include: <br />1. Compazison of the pressure change through the test period to 3% of the test pressure (0.03 X test <br />pressure). If the annulus test pressure changes by this amount or more (gain or loss), the well has <br />failed to demonstrate MI (for all wells), and operation may constitute a violation of the UIC <br />regulations. If the annulus test pressure changes by less than 3 percent (gain or loss) over the test <br />period, the well has demonstrated MI, pursuant [0 40 CFR § 146.8(a)(1); and <br />2. Evaluation of the amount of liquid returned. If less than a cup of liquid is returned, the annulus m <br />be blocked at a shallow depth. In the past criminal charges have been brought as a result of <br />investigations inspired by the observation that very little liquid was returned. The following form <br />can be used to find how much liquid should be returned: <br />dV=(Pt-Pf)xVfxhx0.0000032 <br />where: <br />dV =the amount returned, gals; <br />Pt =the pressure used to test the annulus, psi; <br />Pf =annulus pressure after depressurization, psi; <br />Vf =the volume of one foot of the annulus from <br />Halliburton table 221-B, gals; <br />h =length of the annulus, ft; and <br />0.0000032 gal./gal./psi =the compressibility of water. <br />The result is [he number of gallons of liquid which should be returned. It is also the amount of lic <br />needed to pressurize the annulus to the test pressure once the annulus is filled with liquid. Fora s <br />annulus which might be typical of a Class II well (4-1/2 inch, 1 1.6 Ib/ft. casing and 2-3/8 inch tut <br />pressurized to 300 psi), just under one half gallon of liquid should be returned for each 1,000 feet <br />depth to the packer. [f several gallons of liquid are returned, it is fairly certain that the entire leng~ <br />the casing and tubing have been tested. <br />ATTACHMENT 2 <br />STANDARD ANNULUS MONITORING TEST (SAMT) <br />A. Basis <br />The SAMT is essentially a continuing SAPT; however, interpretation is complicated by operatior <br />effects, principally: 1) injection tubing expansion or contraction as a result of injection pressure <br />changes and 2) well bore temperature changes associated with a) starting or stopping injection or <br />daily and seasonal changes of injectate temperature. To eliminate additional complexities, the <br />regulations now require that the pressure be greater than atmospheric pressure. <br />This means that the annulus pressure should be raised to some pressure and the annulus should th <br />be sealed. The pressure will change in response to temperature changes or even pressure changes <br />the injection tubing. Allowing for some seasonal variation, the range of temperature change shou <br />be consistent. In the event of a casing leak opposite a permeable zone, the pressure will normally <br />probably to zero and, if not, the range of pressure change will be much diminished because the <br />9 of 34 528/99 I :09 PM <br />