Laserfiche WebLink
Underground Injection Control Branch Guidance No. 5 <br />'~ ,~ • <br />wy s i wyg://35/hup://www.epa.gov/reg5oh 20/u i s/r5_O5. h t m <br />353-4148; during nonbusiness hours a message can be left on the voice mail system. Also, pursuant to <br />144.28(6) or 144.51(1)(6) a written submission shall be prepared and sent to Region 5 within five days c <br />the time the operator becomes aware of a loss of MI. <br />Injection into wells which have lost MI can be resumed only after a letter authorizing injection is receiv <br />from the Director. The Director will prepare such a letter only if: 1) the well is repaired, a report detailit <br />the means used to effect the repair is submitted, and MI is demonstrated or 2) the owner/operator <br />demonstrates, by means acceptable to the Director, an absence of flow into or between USDWs pursuat <br />40 CFR § 144.28(!)(4) or 40 CFR 144.5 l(q)(3). As an alternative, the well can be plugged in accordanc <br />with 40 CFR § 146.10. The plugging procedures must remove any threat posed by the absence of MI. If <br />failure is of part 1 of MI, this is usually accomplished through cementing the leaking portion. If the fails <br />is of part 2 the means required to eliminate the fluid movement might be more demanding. Falsificatior <br />MI testing is a violation of 18 USC § 1001 and violators may be subject to criminal penalties. <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br />STANDARD ANNULUS PRESSURE TEST (SAPT) <br />A. Basis <br />Pascal's Law states that any pressure applied to a fluid filling a closed vessel will be transmitted, <br />undiminished, throughout the vessel. This fact is the basis for the selection of the SAPT as the primary <br />means to determine if a well's casing, tubing, packer, and wellhead (the annulus system) are liquid tight <br />fully test the well bore, the pressure applied to the annulus system must be transmitted through the emir <br />well bore. Therefore, no mechanical plug may be placed above the packer in any well subject to testing <br />means of the SAPT. <br />Because the annulus system is not an isolated system (e.g. it transmits energy, but not matter), the meas <br />pressure applied may not be constant through time. The temperatures along the well bore must change t <br />injection rates and temperatures change because of heat exchange between injectate and the surrounding <br />rock. When the well is shut in part of the well bore may cool and part may become warmer. As this <br />happens, the liquid in the annulus contracts or expands. Because liquids are only very slightly <br />compressible, it is very unlikely that the pressure will appear to remain absolutely stable either while [h~ <br />well is shut in or being used for injection. <br />B. Advantages and Disadvantages of the SAPT <br />Advantages of the SAPT <br />• Easy to interpret <br />• Inexpensive to perform <br />Disadvantage of the SAPT <br />• Provides a demonstration at a single point in time <br />C. Equipment and Forms <br />Pressure measurements must be made using a gauge which can be read with sufficient accuracy to ident <br />7 of 34 5!28/99 1:09 PM <br />