Laserfiche WebLink
DEPARTMEN • NATURAL RE III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • <br />David H. Getches, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />January 17, 1985 <br />Mr. Gib Rindahl <br />Rindahl & Associates <br />2305 South Syracuse Way <br />Suite 217 <br />Denver, Colorado 80231 <br />Re: C. Ryan & Son (Leyden P:~), File No. 83-139 <br />Dear Mr. Rindahl: <br />We have reviewed the above referenced permit application for adequacy with the <br />Minerals law and promulgated rules and regulations. This review has taken <br />into consideration not only this application but also Mike Stanton's letter of <br />August 30, 1983 and the reply letter of December 14, 1983 by Jay Silvernale. <br />Thank-you and Paul (I do not remember his last name) for your time in <br />assisting in the inspection of this site of January 15, 1985. This inspection <br />made the review of the application that much easier, <br />As specified in an earlier correspondence, the Board is scheduled to consider <br />this application at the February 27-28, 1985 meeting. Please respond to the <br />following items by February 15, 1985 to allow for Division review. <br />Exhibit C - Maps <br />~~ Rule 1.56(5) discusses mining operations adversely affecting man-made <br />structures located within 200 feet of the operations. Sheet 4 of 7 depicts <br />~$~tn mining operations coming within 100 feet of the water well and power poles. <br />Also, the last sentence on page 8 discusses relocating the water well <br />Q~'~~ pipeline. Because of these activities, the Division believes agreements <br />pursuant to this rule are needed from Public Service Company for their water <br />well and line, and from the owner(s) of the two power lines. <br />L-9 As we discussed in the field, if there is a change in plant location or mining <br />~ sequence due to County concerns, please submit updated maps. <br />Exhibit D - Mining Plan <br />The Division believes staking the permit boundary would be very beneficial to <br />the operator so that all equipment operators are aware of these boundaries <br />aV~ since there are no natural markers. Is this acceptable to the operator? If <br />not, please clarify how the operator will insure the operations stay within <br />the permit boundaries. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />