Laserfiche WebLink
• areas and was less intensively surveyed. Most (about 80%) of Tract I I is under cultivation or used <br />for grazing. Accordingly, this area was inspected by vehicular reconnaissance. The remaining <br />acreage, distributed in six discrete plots of varying sizes, is relatively pristine and was intensively <br />surveyed. <br />These inspections resulted in the location and recordation of 12 cultural resources localities, all in <br />Tract I. Two of these resources were classified as prehistoric sites, both being small scatters of <br />chipped stone materials. Neither one of these sites contained features, nor did they have any <br />diagnostic artifacts which would permit the assignation of cultural or temporal affiliations. The <br />remaining 10 resource localities are isolated finds of one to three chipped stone artifacts, including <br />flakes, unifaces, and a core. None of these localities, sites or IFs, are considered to be significant <br />or eligible for nomination to the NRHP because of their small size, mediocre artifactual assemblage, <br />and absence of buried cultural remains. <br />All of these recorded localities lie on a narrow, flat-topped mesa between two larger drainages. An <br />abundance of floral and faunal resources, and the seasonal availability of potable water, suggested <br />• that the aboriginal occupants may have been exploiting one or the other, or all, of these local <br />resources. The information contents ofthe sites and IFs are individually and cellectivelytoo meager <br />to allow us to confirm these interpretations or postulate more elaborate hypotheses. <br />No significant historic Euroamerican resources were recorded in the project areas. However, in an <br />effort to provide some background on local historic settlement, the land patent records maintained <br />by Montrose County were inspected. This review discovered that nearly all of the land patents in <br />a four mile square area surrounding and incorporating the project areas were taken out during a 10 <br />year period beginning in 1904; the greatest number of Gaims were made in 1910 and 1911. These <br />findings are consistent v~ith local historical records, which relate that the town of Nuca was settled <br />in 1904. Apparently, within a short time after their town was established, the NuGa inhabitants <br />strove to increase their land holdings. 1/Ne cannot, however, interpret fully the patterns in these land <br />patents data without completing additional records searches or oral history interviews. <br />Tract IIA is an irregularly shaped area of 112 acres, located primarily in the SE'/o of Section 6, <br />T.46N, R.15W. It is situated immediately west of Nuca and includes almost entirely disturbed land, <br />• mostly of an agricultural nature. Tract III, a rectangular area, lies northwest of the town and just <br />2.04.4 - 5 <br />