My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE69535
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE69535
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:14:59 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:55:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
PR2 ADEQUACY RESPONSE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• swale varies in elevation through area 9/10 possibly allowing one area's <br />elevation high to be cancelled by an elevation low in another area. <br />In summary, if the hypsometric curve method were to be utilized to depict <br />variances and/or similarities of existing topography to approved post-mining <br />topography, the area depicted by the curve would need to be narrowed to <br />exclude these problems. <br />Also, the contour interval spacing that is chosen for area determination <br />would need to be selected based on the degree of topographic variations <br />present in the area. <br />RESPONSE: <br />The MLRD states that the hypsometric analysis has smoothed out <br />topographic irregularities by combining mine areas 31, 7, 51, and <br />9/10. Furthermore, combining the mine areas and smoothing of <br />irregularities may prevent the hypsometric analysis from detecting <br />differences in approved and existing topography. The mine areas were <br />initially combined to form an area similar to a drainage basin. <br />However, the combined mine areas consisting of areas 31, 7, 51, and <br />9/10 can be divided into five watersheds. Analysis on a basin scale is <br />justified by the contention by many that a drainage basin is the <br />smallest fundamental hydrologic or geomorphic unit. For instance, <br />• Gregory and Walling (1973, preface) state that the drainage basin, "... <br />is visualized increasingly as the fundamental unit of study in fluvial <br />geomorphology...". Ritter (1978, p. 169) describes basins as, "... <br />excellent fundamental units of geomorphic systems." Chorley et al. <br />(1984, p. 316) point out that the drainage basin,". has been <br />recognized as a viable process-response unit since the beginning of the <br />last century." It is concluded then, that comparison of mine areas <br />smaller than a first order basin is inappropriate because it is a <br />comparison of only a portion of the basic geomorphic system unit. <br />The five watersheds are approximately the size of first-order basins <br />and they extend from the lowermost portions of the mine adjacent to <br />South Foidel Creek to the top of the mine. Approximate drainage <br />divides were drawn between adjacent watersheds that remain fixed on <br />both existing and approved topographic maps so that the same area is <br />measured for both conditions. Contour interval for the analysis is 50 <br />feet except in the area of the swale where contour interval is 25 <br />feet. Hypsometric curves for existing and approved topography within <br />the five watersheds (Figs. 1 through 5) are similar indicating, as did <br />the analysis presented in our report, that spoil material has not been <br />significantly re-arranged by mining. Figure 6 shows the relative <br />locations of mine areas, stream channels, and watershed areas. <br />P1LRD COMMENT: <br />• Swale Area <br />The consultants develop a comparison of a natural steep colluvial slope <br />present in the vicinity of the mine with the oversteepened slopes of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.