My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE69503
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE69503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:14:58 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:54:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED FIVE EARTH FILLED EMBANKMENTS HAYDEN GULCH MINE
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX Q
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- 15 - <br />settlement of the emban}.inent to be on the order of 4 to 5 incises. host <br />•of this settlement will occur durim construction, so that overbuild or <br />cambering of the wtlet works will not be rewired. Cut and fill <br />transition slopes should be gradual to mini;aize differential settle- <br />ments. ~ ~ ' <br />See^a7e: Ihera should be only a minor mount of see9ane teneat!~ and <br />through the dan after the reca~unended foundation treat:;~ent is <br />completed. The sandstone :;,cdrock i~elew the unner fractured c~ertion is <br />not highly pervious. A noninal cutoff into competent bedrock is <br />rammmended and shown on the typical section. This cutoff should <br />extend un the abutment sides to key the e^~bank.^~ent material, into the <br />• unweathered bedrock. <br />G~tlet F7orks: A.n 18-inch diameter autlst '..arks with the inlet invert <br />at elevation 7501.7 is planned at Sta. 2+60. Slope protection till be <br />required on the outlet side as this exits about 45 feet ~!^ove the toe <br />of the downstream embanlclent and about 120 feet in length alorxl the <br />slope. Continuirr3 the 13-inch diameter culvort along the face and <br />dischargi:r~ it at the tx would be a desirable consideration. 'Phis <br />would probably be less costly than a protected open channel and ~,~ould <br />be safer as far as erosion on the faro of the dam is concerned. <br />Spillway: The procosed spillway will be at Sta. 3+40. The spillway <br />will be discharging across the downstream face of the dam. At this <br />point, we remrm~end that a channel with erosion rrotection-~be cut in <br />the natural soils to conduct any overflow well beyond the tce of the <br />• embank-nent. Once this channel is :'nyound tho toe of the slope, it can <br />be directed down into the natural drainage. <br />I s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.