Laserfiche WebLink
FeGruary 7999 Yoart Mine * 13-12 Draixage and SerGmext CaretrolPkn NB <br />• <br />TABLE ]3-12.6 <br />Guide to Retatdance Class Selection <br />Stand Length of Vegetation <br />in. Retatdance Class <br />Good <br /> >30 A <br /> 11-24 B <br /> 6-10 C <br /> 2-6 D <br /> <2 E <br />Fair <br /> >30 B <br /> 11-24 C <br /> 6-10 D <br /> 2-G D <br /> <2 E <br />Under short grass conditions, the channel is more prone to being eroded than during tall grass <br />conditions. Consequently, stability is evaluated under short grass conditions. Retatdance classes <br />of D and E are typically used for stability analysis of vegetated channels. <br />Tall grass conditions are used to determine channel capacity. The tall grass affords a great deal of <br />resistance to channel flow as a function of stem basel area and by laying over during high flows. <br />The higher the resistance, the higher elevation of flowing water in the channel. Retatdance classes <br />of A through C (especially A and B) are used for capacity analysis. <br />SCC used retardance values of Class D for stability and Class B for capacity. <br />Freeboard <br />In accordance with Rule 4.05.3, SCC designed all postmine channels with a minimum freeboard of <br />0.3 feet. <br />The minimum channel designs for the vegetated channels are summarized on the Figure 13-12.3. <br />SEDCAD4 demonstrations are presented in Appendix 13-12.3. <br />6.2 Rock Riprap Channel Design <br />Prior to 2007, all unstable channel reaches (e.g., flow velocities greater than 5 fps) were armored <br />with rock riprap. Riprap size was determined using the SEDCAD4 riprap lined channel sub- <br />routine, utilizing either the Simons/OSM (Simons, et al., 1982) or PARER (Pennsylvania <br />Department of Environmental Resources, Stover, 1990) method. <br />The minimum channel designs for the rock riprap lined channels are summarized on Figure 13- <br />12.3. Given the uncertainty in determining riprap Dso for steep slopes with the PARER Method, <br />SCC adds an additional 3-inches to the model recommended Dso size. SEDCAD4 demonstrations <br />are presented in Appendix 13-12.3. <br />6.3 Turf Reinforcement Mat Channel Design <br />Turf Reinforcement Mats (TRMs) allow vegetation to be used in areas where flow conditions <br />exceed the limits of natural vegetation (e.g., limiting velocities greater than 5 fps). They can be <br />used for steeper slopes (1.SH:1V, or flatter) and under medium to high flow conditions. <br />Montgomery Watron Mining Group * 765 S. Union Boulevard, Suite 460 * I~kewood, Colorado 80228 * (303) 763-5140 <br />TR-30 Revised 03/07 <br />