My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE69098
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE69098
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:14:36 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:42:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/23/1997
From
WILDERNESS AWARE
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~~ ~-mnumi m <br />•~ ~ • ~•• ~sss ~ nu m <br />III IIIIIIIIII'lllll <br />sss <br />~`~'~-s ' p.o. box 1550, bueua vista, Colorado <br />81211 <br />gyp, 719-395-2112 • 1-800-IN-A-RAFT <br />July 19, 1997 <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Jim Stevens <br />1313 Sherman St. <br />Room 2 ] 5 ~~ <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RECEIVED <br />JUL 2 31997 <br />Bivisinn of MiMr91S r4 ~eoiogy <br />Dear Jim, <br />I am writing to express my concem regarding Agile Stone Systems' application for a <br />Conditional Use Permit (file name, CUP 97-5 Parkdale Aggregate Mine). My concem is based <br />on the fact that Agile Stone's Proposed Project Description is inadequate in its presentation of <br />the impacts to the site and the area. As a commercial outfitter on the Arkansas River, I am <br />distressed by the fact the possible effects of the proposed project on the recreation and tourism <br />industry is not even addressed in the Proposed Project Description. It would seem logical that <br />some consideration would be given to the effects of the mine on the visual resources, water <br />quality, air quality, dust, vegetation, and riparian habitat in one of the most populaz tourism and <br />recreation areas in the state. <br />I am equally as concerned at the pace of which this project is seemingly being approved. <br />A decision [hat has such potential long term effects as this one should require extensive site <br />surveys, impact analysis, more extensive public hearings, water and air quality analysis and <br />traffic impact studies as well as a study on the impacts on recreation and tourism. It appears <br />obvious to me that few if any of these issues have been adequately addressed. <br />As much as I would like to see the entire CUP denied, if it were to be approved I would <br />like to see the above issues addressed; as well as extensive and detailed visual screening plans, <br />noise impact minimization and specific transportation outlines containing both rail and non-rail <br />hauling options. , <br />S# /fir. ~-~~ ~~r <br />Please give this matter the serious consideration that it deserves. C/ Qs C ~I to <br />Sincerely, rGt~du~ ,•d-• ~ ! f u"'r{r <br />Joe Greiner Q~No- `~~~~ I <br />~ ~~ ~ <br />P Please notify me of any future meetings regarding this issue, and feel free to call me if I can <br />be of any assistance. <br />Fax:719-395-6716 • Email: <br />• web site: <br />•= <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.