My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO29247
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO29247
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:48:15 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:34:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
12/17/1997
Doc Name
FINAL PERMIT COLORADO WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PN CO-0027146 POWDERHORN COAL CO MESA CNTY
From
CDOH
To
POWDERHORN COAL
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART II <br />Page No. 29 <br />Permit No. CO-0027146 <br />B. RESPONSIBILITIES <br />16. Antibackslidin¢ <br />ii. Information is available which was not available at the time of permit issuance (other than revised regulations, <br />guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the application of a less stringent effluent limitation or <br />standard at the time of permit issuance; or <br />iii. The Division determines that technical mistakes or mistaken interpretations of law were made in issuing the <br />permit, which justified relaxation of the effluent limitations or standards; or <br />iv. A less stringent effluent limitation or standard is necessary because of events over which the permittee has no <br />control and for which there is not reasonable available remedy; or <br />v. The permittee has received a permit variance; or <br />vi. The permittee has installed the treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous permit <br />and has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the previous <br />effluent limitations, in which case, the limitations in the renewed, reissued, or modified permit may reflect the <br />level of pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than required by effluent guidelines in <br />effect at the time of permit renewal, reissuance, or modification). <br />b. A permit may not be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain effluent limitations adopted pursuant to Section 61.8(2) <br />of the Colorado Dischazge Permit System Regulations that aze less stringent than the comparable effluent limitations in <br />the previous permit, unless any of the exceptions provided herein is met'and the conditions of paragraph c, of this <br />section are met. <br />i. In waters where the applicable water quality standard has not yet been attained, effluent limitations based on a <br />total maximum daily load of other waste load allocation may be revised to be less stringent if the cumulative effect <br />of all such revisions assures attainment of such water quality standard, or the designated use which is not being <br />attained is removed in accordance with Section 31.6 of the Basic Standards. <br />ii. In waters where the applicable water quality standard has been attained, effluent limitations based on a total <br />maximum daily load, other waste load allocation, or any other permitting standard (including any water quality <br />standard) may be revised to be less stringem if such revision is subject to and consistent with the antidegradation <br />provisions of Section 31.8 of the Basic Standazds. Consistency with Section 31.8 shall be presumed if the waters <br />in question have been designated by the Commission as "use protected"; or <br />iii. Whether or not the applicable water quality standard has been attained: <br />(A) Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility occurred after permi[ issuance which <br />justified the application of less stringem effluent limitations; or <br />(B) A less stringent effluem limitation is necessary because of events over which the permittee has no control and <br />for which there is not reasonable available remedy; or <br />(C) The permittee has received a permit variance; or <br />(D) The permittee has installed the treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous <br />permit and has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the <br />previous effluent limitations, in which case, the limitations in the reviewed, reissued, or modified permit may <br />reflect the level of pollutam control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than required by effluent <br />guidelines in effeci at the time of permit renewal, reissttance, or modification). <br />c. In no event tray a permit with respect [o which paragraphs a. and b, of this section apply be renewed, reissued, or <br />modified to contain an effluent limitation or standard which is less stringent than required by federal effluent <br />guidelines in effect at the time the permit is renewed, reissued, or modified. In no event may such a permit to <br />discharge into state waters be renewed, reissued, or modified to wntain a less stringent effltent limitation if the <br />implementation of such limitation would result in a violation of an applicable water quality standard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.