My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO29240
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO29240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:48:15 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:34:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
12/13/2002
Doc Name
Updated Discharge Permit Copy
From
J.E. Stover & Associates
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART II <br />Page No. 26 <br />Permit No. CO-0044776 <br />;; RESPONSIBII.ITIES <br />16. ~rttibaclislidine <br />ii. Information is available which was not available at the time of permit issuance (other than revised regulations, <br />guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the application of a less stringent effluent limitaiian or <br />standazd at the time of permit issuance; or <br />lli. The Division determines that technical mistakes or mistaken interpretations of law were made in issuing the <br />permit, which justified relaxation of the effluent limitations or sandazds; or <br />iv. A less stringent effluent limitation or standazd is necessary because of events over which the permittee has no - <br />control and for which there is not reasonable available remedy; or <br />v. The permittee has received a permit variance; or <br />vi. The.permittee has installed Ste treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous permit <br />and has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the previous <br />effluent limitations, in which case, the limitations in the renewed, reissued, or modified permit may reflect the <br />leve] of pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than requred by effluent guidelines in <br />effect at the time of permit renewal, reissuance, or modification). <br />b. A permit may not be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain effluent limitations adopted pursuant to Section <br />61.8(2)(b) or (c) of the Colorado Dischazge Permit System Regulations that aze less stringent than the comparable <br />effluent limitations in the previous permit, unless any of the exceptions provided herein is met and the conditions of <br />pazagraph c. of this section aze met. <br />i. In waters where the applicable water quality standazd has not yet been attained, effluent limitations based on a <br />total maximum daily load or other waste load allocation may be revised to be less stringent if the cumulative effect <br />of all such revisions assures attainment of such water quality standazd, or the designated use which is not being <br />attained is removed in accordance with Section 31.6 of the Basic Standards. <br />ll. In waters where the applicable water quality standazd has been attained, effluent limitations based on a total <br />maximum daily load, other waste load allocation, or any other permitting standazd (including any water quality <br />standazd) may be revised to be less stringent if such revision is subject to and consistent with the antidegradation <br />provisions of Section 31.8 of the Basic Standazds. Consistency with Section 31.8 shall be presumed if the waters <br />in question have been designated by the Commission as "use protected"; or <br />iii. Whether or not the applicable water quality standazd has been attained: <br />(A) Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility occurred after permit issuance which <br />justified the application of less stringent effluent limitations; or <br />(B) A less stringent effluent limitation is necessary because of events over which the pertnittee has no control and <br />for which there is not reasonable available remedy; or <br />(C} The permittee has received a permit vaziance; or <br />(D) The permittee has installed the treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous <br />permit and has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the <br />previous effluent limitations,.in which case, the limitations in the reviewed, reissued, or modified permit tray <br />reflect the level of pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than required by effluent <br />guidelines in effect at the time of permit renewal, reissttance, or modification). <br />_ . c. In no event may a permit with respect to which paragraphs a. and b. of this section apply be renewed, reissued, or <br />modified to contain ad effluent limitation of standazd which is less stringent than required by federal effluent <br />guidelines in effect at the time the permit is renewed, reissued, or modified. In no event may such a permit to <br />dischazge into state waters be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain a [ess stringent effluent limitation if the <br />implementation of such limitation would result in a violation of an applicable water quality standazd. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.