My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO29240
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO29240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:48:15 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:34:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
12/13/2002
Doc Name
Updated Discharge Permit Copy
From
J.E. Stover & Associates
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
''~ 13. RESPONSIBILITIES <br />PART II <br />Page No. 23 <br />Permit No. CO-0044776 <br />5. Modification Suspension Revocation or Termination of P tTrti ~ By the Division (continued] <br />(A) The permit condition requested to be modified was based on a promulgated effluent limitation guideline, EPA <br />approved water quality standazd, or an effluent limitation set forth in 5 CCR 1002-62, et seq.; and <br />(B) EPA has revised, withdrawn, or modified that portion of the regulation or effluent limitation guideline on <br />which the permit condition was based, or has approved a Commission action with respect to the water quality <br />standazd or effluent limitation on which the permit condition was based; and <br />(C) The permittee requests modification afrer the notice of final action by which the EPA effluent limitation <br />guideline, water quality standazd, or effluent limitation is revised, withdrawn, or modified; or <br />(D) For judicial decisions, a court of competent jurisdiction has remanded and stayed EPA promulgated <br />regulations or effluent limitation guidelines, if the remand and stay concern that portion of the regulations or <br />guidelines on which the permit condition was based and a request is fded by the permittee in accordance with <br />this Regulation, within ninety days of judicial remand. <br />iv. The Division determines that good cause exists to modify a permit condition because of events over which the <br />permittee has.no conaol and for which there is no reasonable available remedy. ' <br />v. The permittee has received a variance. <br />vi. When required to incorporate applicable toxic effluent limitation or standards adopted pursuant to § 307(a) of the <br />Federal act. - <br />vii. When required by the reopener conditions in the permit. <br />viii. As necessary under 40 CFR 403.8(e), to include a compliance schedule for the development of a preaeatment <br />program. <br />ix. When the level of discharge of any pollutant which is not limited in the permit exceeds the level which can be <br />achieved by ttte technology-based treatment requirements appropriate to the permittee under Section 61.8{2) of the <br />Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations. <br />z: To establish a pollutant notification levei required in Section 61.8(5) of the Colorado Discharge Permit System <br />Regulations. <br />xi. To correct technical mistakes, such as errors. in calculation, or mistaken interpretations of law made in <br />determining permit conditions, to the extent allowed in Section 61.10 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System <br />Regulations. <br />zii. When required by a permit condition to incorporate a land application plan for beneficial reuse of sewage sludge, <br />to revise an existing land application plan, or to add a land application plan. <br />xiii. For any other cause provided in Section 61.10 of the Colorado Dischazge Permit System Regulatiaas. <br />c. At the request of a permittee, the Division may modify or terminate a permit and issue a new permit if the following <br />conditions aze met: <br />i. The Regional Administrator has been notified of the proposed modification or termination and does not object in <br />writing within thirty days of receipt of notification, <br />ii. The Division fords that the permittee has shown reasonable grounds consistent with the Federal and State <br />iii. Requirements of Section 62.15 of rite Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulatiots have been met, and <br />iv. Requirements of public notice have been met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.