Laserfiche WebLink
.s~~>'.`.-s. DEFINITION OF EFFLUENT LII~IITATIONS <br />PART I <br />Page 7 <br />Permit No. CO-0044776 <br />6. ~'i'hole Effluent Toxiciri Testin¢ Rey ~;rements fAcntel - Ontfall 002 (continued) <br />Any permittee that is required to conduct a PTIITIE investigation shall do so is conformance with procedures <br />identified in the following documents, or as subsequently updated: I) Methods for Am.atic Tozicirv <br />identification Evaluations. Phase I Tonicity .h^rac~Prinr;on Pt - d ~ c, EPA/600/6-911003 Feb. 91 and 2) <br />Methods for Aquatic Tonicity Identification FvaluaNonc Phase Ii Tozici{y~ Identificaflon Pr d it c, <br />EPA/600/3-88/035 Feb. 1989. <br />A third document is this series is Methods for Aquatic Tonicity Identification Evaluations. Phase III To i itv <br />Confirmation Procedure , EPA/600J3-881036 Feb. 1989. As indicated by the title, this procedure is intended <br />confirm that the suspected toxicant is truly the toxicant. This investigation is optional. <br />Within 90 days of the determination of the toxicant or no later than 210 days after demonstration of toxicity, <br />whichever is sooner, a control program is to be developed and received by the Division. The progtam shall st <br />down a method and procedure for elimination of the tonicity to acceptable levels. <br />e. Best For Relief <br />The permittee may request relief from further investigation and testing where the tozicam has not been <br />determined and the Division has determined suitable treatment does not appear possible. Iri requesting such <br />relief, the permittee shall submit material sufficient to establish the following: <br />I. It has complied with terms and conditions of the permit compliance schedule for the PTIfIIE investigaflon <br />and other appropriate conditions as may have been required by the Division; <br />ii. During the period of the toxicity incident it has been is compliance with all other permit conditions, <br />including, in the case of a POTW, pretreatment requirements; <br />iii. Doting the period of the toxicity incident it has properly maintained and operated all facilities and systems <br />of treatment and control; and <br />iv. Despite the circutostances described in pazagraphs m and (iii) above, the source and/or cause of toxicity <br />could not be located or resolved. <br />If deemed appropriate by the Division, the permit or the compliance schedule may be modified to revise the <br />ongoing monitoring and toxicity investigadon.requirements to avoid an unproductive expenditure of the <br />permittee's resources, provided that the underlying obligation to eliminate any continuing exceedance of the <br />toxicity limit shall remain. <br />f. $yontaneous Disappearance <br />If toxicity spontaneously disappeazs at any time after a test failure, the permittee shall notify the Division in <br />writing within 14 days of a demonstration of disappeazance of the toxicity. The Division may require the <br />permittee to develop and submit additional information which may include, but is not limited to, the resulu of <br />additional testing. If no pattern of toxicity is identified or recurring toxicity is not identified, the toxicity <br />incident response is considered closed and normal WET testing shall resume. <br />g. Toxici Rr,Qpener <br />This permit may be reopened and modified (following proper administrative procedures) to include new <br />compliance dates, additional or modified numerical permit limitations, a new or different compliance schedule <br />change in the whole effluent tonicity testing protocol, or any other conditions related to the control of toxicant <br />if one or more of the following events occur: <br />I. Toxicity has been demonstrated in the effluent and the permit does not contain a toxicity limitation. <br />Amendment No. 1 Issued JUNE 28 1 999 Effective AUGUST 1 7 999 <br />