My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO29240
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO29240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:48:15 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:34:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
12/13/2002
Doc Name
Updated Discharge Permit Copy
From
J.E. Stover & Associates
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART I <br />Page 5 <br />Permit No. CO-0044776 <br />A. DEFINTI'LON OF EFFLUENT LINIITATIONS <br />4. Burden of Proof Requirements <br />The pertnittee has the burden of proof when requesting relief from total suspended solids (TSS), total iron and/or <br />settleable so]ids limitations, as appropriate. The permittee should endeavor to meet [he primary limitations <br />whenever possible. Relief is not available for mine drainage alone, nor when the majority of a dischazge consists <br />thine drainage. <br />Eor rainfall, to waive TSS and total iron limitations, it is necessary to demonstrate that dischazge occurred within 48 <br />hours afrer measurable precipitation has stopped. To waive settleable solids limitations, it is necessary to prove tha[ <br />discharge occurred within 48 hours after precipitation greater than the 10-yeaz, 24-hour event has stopped. <br />For snowmelt, to waive TSS and total iron limitations, it is necessary to demonstrate that discharge occurred within <br />48 hours after pond inflow has stopped. To waive settleable solids limitations, it is necessary to prove that <br />discharge occurred within 48 hours after pond inflow volume greater than the 10-yeaz, 24-hour event has stopped. <br />Should a precipitation event or snowmelt occur, the permittee shall submit adequate proof in order for an exemption <br />to be claimed. Weather station data should be submitted where appropriate. Documentation that the treatment <br />facilities were properly operated and maintained prior to and during the storm event must be submitted with any <br />request for relief. Additionally. for outfall 002. the netatittee must demonstrate chat Le maiorirv of the dischara,& <br />for which Le ezemp ion is cl imed conci tc of urfa mnoff Said proof shall be submitted as an attachment to the <br />Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the appropriate period. The Division shall determine the adequacy of <br />proof. As part of this determination, the Division shall evaluate whether the permittee could have controlled the <br />discharge in such a manner that primary limitations could have been met, whether proper sediment storage leve]s <br />were maintained and the ponds had sufficient water and sediment capacity for the storm event plus other relevant <br />factors. All manual pond dewatering must meet TSS and total iron limitations unless previous approval has been <br />granted for ponds that have ~ other method of dewatering. For ponds with automatic dewacering structures,. only <br />dischazges through these structures are eligible for the exemption. <br />5. Poct-Mining reac <br />In conformance with 40 CFR 434.50, commencing at the time active mining has ceased and all surface azeas served <br />by a sedimentation pond have been returned to the required contour and revegetation has commenced, applicable <br />dischazges may be eligible for limitations other than those specified in Part I.A.1. In most cases, these post-mining <br />limitations shall remain in effect until bond release. The permittee shall notify the Division at the appropriate time <br />so that consideration of permit modifications can be made. Prior to notification and subsequent permit modification, <br />active mining limitations will apply regazdless of actual mine status. <br />6. Whole Effluent Toricity a 'ng_~eglrirementc (Acut 1 - Outf 11 002 <br />a. Testing and Reporting Reaitirements <br />WET testing shall be required whenever the discharge contains any flow from mine drainage and/or spoils spring <br />sources. WET testing is not required when a dischage consists entirely of surface runoff. If discharge from outfall <br />002 contains mine drainage at anv time during the appropriate monitoring frequency period, WET testing is <br />required during that period. Tests shall be done at the frequency listed in Part I.B.1. Test resulzs shall be <br />reported along with the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) submitted for the reporting period during which <br />the sample was taken. (i.e., WET testing results for the first calendaz quar[er ending March 31 shall be reported <br />with the DMR due April 28.) The results shall be submitted on the Acute Tociciry Test report form. available <br />=_ from the Division. Copies of these reports aze [o be submitted to both the Division and EPA along with the <br />- DMR. <br />t ;~- <br />Amendment.No. 1 Issued ~ NAT (lam Effective ~t~' ` ~ - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.