My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-07-31_PERMIT FILE - M2003001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2003001
>
2003-07-31_PERMIT FILE - M2003001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2023 1:30:44 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:32:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/31/2003
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Hall-Irwin Corporation
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 3 presents a summary of the historic use for the period 1969 - 1996 for the 2.5 shazes of <br />Lower Latham Ditch and the 2.25 shares of Lower Latham Reservoir used on the Nissen Farm. <br />The consumptive use attributed to both the 2.5 shazes of ditch water and the 2.25 shares of <br />reservoir water was estimated using a maximum field application efficiency of 63 percent and <br />the modified Blaney-Griddle method. Tables 4 and 5 show the river headgate diversions of the <br />Lower Latham Ditch and the calculated reservoir releases of the Lower Latham Reservoir. In <br />addition, Table 3 presents the pro-rata farm headgate deliveries of the 2.5 shares of ditch water <br />and the 2.25 shazes of reservoir releases, assuming a 20 percent ditch loss. There are 200 <br />outstanding shazes in the Lower Latham Ditch and 156 outstanding shazes in the Lower Latham <br />Reservoir. Table 3 also shows the prorated consumptive use of 2.5 shares ditch water and the <br />2.25 shares of reservoir water and the lagged returns associated with both sources. It was <br />assumed that 50 percent of the return flow volume returned to the river assub-surface and [fie <br />other 50 percent was surface return flow, The one-site groundwater return flows were lagged <br />back to the South Platte River using an 8 day stream depletion factor determined from Hun's <br />1965 SDF maps. The average yeaz conditions were used to show sufficient replacement water <br />existed as the 1977 reservoir releases significantly exceeded the 1969 - 1996 average releases. <br />A copy of the stock certificates for the 2.5 shares of ditch and 2.25 shazes of reservoir water aze <br />enclosed. Water Resources is a subsidiary company owned by Hall-Irwin Corporation. <br />Conclnsions <br />The 45.30 acre-feet of average annual pit depletions will be replaced using 0.60 shares of Lower <br />Latham Ditch and 2.25 shazes of Lower Latham Reservoir via direct release to the South Platte <br />River. Table 6 presents an accounting form that will be used to track operational losses and <br />replacement supplies. <br />Figure 1 shows all wells located in the vicinity of the proposed Nissen Pit. There is one well not <br />owned byHall-Irvin that will be located within 600 feet of the mining azea (Wickershame <br />#161560). However, since the pit will be lined prior to when mining operations commence, the <br />de-watering activities associated with the wells will not cause injury to this well. The operation <br />of this TSSP will not cause injury to senior water rights on the South Platte River. <br />Sincerely, <br />Enclosures <br />cc: ICim Lawrence <br />Forrest Leaf, <br />Water Rights • Hydrology • Hydraulics • Water Quality <br />E:\reaftNell\Gravel Pits\South Platte\Rein Revised Nissrn Ptl TSSP Regeest Letter.doC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.