My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-03-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2000-03-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2021 12:05:20 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:17:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/15/2000
Doc Name
1999 Annual Hydrologic Report
Annual Report Year
1999
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1999 Report Section 2.5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Figure A-1 presents water levels versus time for wells GB-1, GB-5, GF-5 and P-5. <br /> The wells are completed in the KLM, HI, HI backill and 2nd White Sandstone aquifers, <br /> respectively. Figure A-1 shows steady increases in water levels for GB-1 since air-lift <br /> production ceased in 1993. Recovery in this well may still be from the earlier air-fift <br /> production. Water levels in wells GB-5 and GF-5 were steady in 1999 after a gradual rise <br /> over the last few years. HI wells GC-1 and GP-7 should show natural variations in the HI <br /> aquifer for 1999 and their water levels showed a small decline in 1999. Water-level <br /> elevations in well P-5 have been fairly steady for the last few years. Water levels continue <br /> to rise in well GB-2, probably in response to recovery at its location downgradient of a <br /> reclaimed pit(see Figure A-2). <br /> The GC wells (GC-1, GC-2, GC-3, see Figure A-3) are located near the northeast <br /> comer of the permit area (PA) nearly one-half of a mile from mining activity. These wells <br /> are completed in the HI, 3rd White and alluvial aquifers, respectively. The water-level <br /> changes in these wells are still good indicators of natural recharge impacts on these <br /> aquifers. Water levels in well GC-1 gradually declined due to less recharge in 1999. Water <br /> levels in wells GC-2 and GC-3 both show a similar gradual water-level decline in 1999. The <br /> declines in all three wells are due to the decreased 1999 precipitation. The alluvial aquifer <br /> response is generally of a larger magnitude. <br /> Figure A-4 presents the static water-level elevations for wells GD-2, GD-3 and <br /> GP-9. These wells are completed in the QR, QR backfill and 3rd White Sandstone aquifers. <br /> In 1999, water levels in wells GD-2 and GD-3 were fairly steady with an overall small <br /> decline. The water-level elevation in 1999 for well GD-3 is several feet higher than the <br /> level downgradient at well GD-2. Well GD-3 is approximately 1200 feet upgradient of well <br /> 2-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.