Laserfiche WebLink
x,..041:1/1995 13:35 303-782-0390 CDH WWCD WWCC PAGE 02 <br />J • • <br />COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT <br />Water t7uality Control Division <br />Permits end Enforcement Section <br />INTER-0EPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM <br />To: Berhan Keffelew, Division of Minerals and Geology - 1313 Sherman Street <br />From: Patricia Nelson, Industrial Permit Enfofcatnent Pro ram, Wa r puality Control Division <br />Date: April 11, 1995IChi~1 <br />Re: Cripple Creek and Victor Gold, CDPS Permit No. CO-0043848 <br />Request to Utilize Water from Pond 4C for Mine-Site Dust Suppression <br />We have reviewed the copy of the request you received from CCBV to use the water from pond 4C. <br />While the treatment of the pond water with hydrogen peroxide will apparently be capable of greatly <br />reducing the cyanide concentrations in the pond water, the data submitted to you by CCBV shows the final <br />WAD cyanide concentretions to remain at 0.068 mg/I, which is above the 0.030 mg/l stream standard that <br />applies to the surface waters in the effected watershed. <br />Additionally, the use of hydrogen peroxide for the treatment of cyanide was probaby the cause for the <br />extremely high levels of ammonia that were found in the treated pond water - 46 mg/l. This is much <br />higher than concentrations that are used to estimate allowable instream rancentretions, and higher that <br />levels that are generally regarded to be toxic to aquatic organisms. <br />The data for the treated pond water also show very high levels for severel metals. A comparison of the <br />data CC&V provided against the surface water stream standards for the Arequa Gulch Basin is provided <br />below: <br /> ' <br />Cyanide, WAD 0.030 0.088 <br />Total Ammonia 0.2 48.0 <br />Cadmium 0.003 0.038 <br />Chromium 0.050 024 <br />Copper 0.039 13.0 <br />Mercury 0.00001 0.0013 <br />Nickel 0.2 0.56 <br />Zinc 0.34 0.48 <br />Total Ammonia stream standard is estimated based upon regional anaysis. <br />An examination of the above table shows that if the road spreying results in any surface drainage, it would <br />need a permit since it definitey is high in pollutants. <br />