My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67963
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67963
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:13:38 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979206
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/8/1980
Doc Name
US SOIL CONDITIONING MAVERICK PLACER OUR FN 79-206
From
MLR
To
ROBERT G BIGLOW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t_ <br />-~--,... <br />' of eater (at the mina site or at the crusher and plant sites) affect <br />any ether water ri.ghrs? <br />• 2) Ilow is runoff water from Che mine, crusher-stockpile and plan[ <br />.~ucrulled? Any potential scdiwuttatiuu prublews in[u Mavcriuk Culch <br />and/or [he Arkansas t<iver should bu mitigated. <br />Exhibit J; Tret planting is said to be imprac[iual due to low Survival, <br />slew growth and rocky soils. Exhibit E should weu[iun ways in which these <br />problems are uIfset in order co plant seadling trees during reclamation <br />Phase LI1. <br />Gxhibic L: 'Che MLR stafF considers several factors when evaluating reclama- <br />tion CUdCS !n order to suggest a bond awount fur ~ miuiug operation. Ke- <br />cl.,iwinl; mining sites like Chu Maverick Placer having n large percentuga <br />ul steep slopes anJ ul,my Leeches tends Cu be wore cw cly than :roerage. <br />liunding must be based uu the reclamation costs cu be incurred by the <br />State of Colorado if the euoipany defaults [orally on the reclamation. 'i'lls <br />makes the equipment and labor cos [s greatar fur the State than Per an <br />opera[or. Therefore, fur an operation such as the Maverick Placer, bending <br />of at bast $1,000.00 per acre will be suggested. We can discuss details <br />.onceruing Chis later, after a new Cotul acreage has been calculated. <br />P:xhibit M: The le[tur from Prewont Cowt[y is uwr two years old. Cuuuty <br />appruva.l was given based on uu expansion of the Maverick Placer operation. <br />C.m you assure [I,e Scaff Chat nu such expansion has occurred since Che <br />date of this letcer! <br />• lu cuuclusiun, it swws nece:;uary to cxpaud the affected ucreuge to Ltelude <br />crusher-stockpile and plant .treas. 'Chose areas shuulJ be described Lt <br />the exhibits men[iuned above and the application tee should be increased <br />accordingly. 'Che change in legal description resulting from the added <br />a u cage will require republ:icatiun and fLling new waCerlals with Greuwut <br />County. Hence, we should probably make ull haste iu this mater Co make <br />the January muting daadllne. If you have any questions conceruiug ally of my <br />cuuuuents, please call. 1 am sure we can work together to geC an adequate <br />.ipp ti,:.,t ion fur the Muvuridc Placer Leof re Uie J,uwary Mined Laud Rec lum.,t iuu <br />Bu, u-,1 wuet lug. <br />5inrercly, <br />~/ - . <br />i <br />Mark S. Luyu <br />Iteclamaciun SpeCialis[ <br />PI~I./ jg <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.