Laserfiche WebLink
• site aze considerably more resistant to scour than the materials found on the Soutlr Platte. <br />Taking the above factors into account, I would recommend that the requirements found in <br />the guidelines regarding minimum berm top widths could be reduced by 25% for <br />application at the St. Vrain mining site and still be considered conservative (large: margin <br />of safety). The minimum berm top widths are intended to provide sufficient width to <br />prevent failure of the berm due to scour and/or head-cutting during a flood event. Please <br />note that the guidelines define "beans" to be areas of native material separating ~i river or <br />stream from the overbank gravel pits, or one overbank gravel pit from another overbank <br />gravel pit. The term "berm top width" used in the guidelines is essentially the distance <br />from the top of the stream bank to the top of the gravel pit bank, or the distance t~etween <br />the top of the banks of adjacent pits. In this report, and with respect to the proposed <br />mining and reclamation plan, this distance is considered to be the recommended setback <br />distance of the top of the gravel pit excavation to the top of the St. Vrain Creek <br />streambank. <br />The 25% reduction of the required berm top widths (setback distance) is the only <br />recommended modifications to the UDFCD guidelines. All other guideline requirements <br />regarding sizing of rip-rap rock, extents of protection, etc. are recommended to be <br />followed. <br />Riverbank Protection <br />• The south banks and overbank areas of the St. Vrain Creek adjacent to the proposed <br />mining site are generally gently sloped, well vegetated, and do not appear to be <br />experiencing ongoing bank erosion. Therefore, riverbank protection work or stat~ilization <br />is not required nor recommended as part of the proposed mining and reclamation plan. <br />Pitside Bank Protection <br />The perimeter slopes of reclaimed gravel pits require additional erosion protection <br />beyond revegetation if the embankment separating the pit from the creek is to be: <br />protected from loss during large flood events. Protection of the pitside banks permits <br />reduction of the required setback distance of the top of the pit bank from the top of the <br />streambank. The UDFCD guidelines recommend that neither riverbank or pitside bank <br />protection is necessary if the distance separating the pit from the river is at least 400 feet <br />wide. For the proposed mine site this distance will be reduced 25% to 300 feet as <br />discussed above. If pitside bank protection as specified by the guidelines is provided, the <br />setback distance may be reduced to a minimum of 225 feet (a 25% reduction of the <br />guidelines 300 ft. distance). Therefore, at no point should the top of a mining pit bank be <br />closer than 225 feet to the top of the south bank of the St. Vrain Creek. A distance of 300 <br />feet however, is preferred since no pitside bank protection would be required in that case. <br />As currently shown on the map titled "Reclamation Contours" (Exhibit F-3, Sheet 8 of <br />• 12) of the submitted Mining and Reclamation Plan, riverside setback distances of less <br />than 250 feet aze currently proposed for two locations in Phase II (East Plant), and one <br />6 <br />