My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO28889
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO28889
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:59 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:00:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/10/1989
Doc Name
CHANNEL CERTIFICATIONS DRAINAGE OF 7 91-1 31-2 41 51 51W ECKMAN PARK FN C-81-071
From
CYPRUS YAMPA VALLEY COAL CORP
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
PROF POND CERTIFICATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACZ Inc. <br />Engineering and Analytical Services <br />1475 Pine Grove Road <br />PO. Box 774078 <br />Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 <br />303-879-6260 <br />June 2, 1989 <br />Mr. Rick Mills <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Company- <br />29588 Routt County Road 27 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />Re: Channel Certifications - MLRD Comment Letter Dated April 7, 1989 <br />Dear Rick: <br />I have reviewed the MLRD letter and believe the following responses should <br />put these questions to rest: <br />Regarding the October 31, 1988 inspection, no stand alone inspection report <br />was completed. The November 1, 1988 letter serves as the final inspection <br />report. During the October 31, 1988 inspection, all previously noted <br />deficiencies in channel construction had been corrected. <br />With respect to the question of riprap specification, a little background <br />on riprap design should be helpful. Riprap design is an empirical process <br />and not one subject to rigorous numerical techniques. Therefore, as part <br />of the riprap design and construction process, it is customary to allow a <br />range of material size consist in recognition of the empirical nature of <br />the design, the difficulty in securing and mixing quantities of large <br />irregularly shaped rock and the difficulty in accurately sampling and <br />measuring those rocks. It has been my practice to allow variations of plus <br />or minus ten (10) percent from the design specification for riprap <br />gradation sizes. I have found this to be a practice which is workable in <br />the field and which will not compromise the actual design. In particular <br />for construction of the drainages at Colorado Yampa Coal Company, I found <br />the construction process to be exceptionally well supervised and <br />implemented further reinforcing some measure of relief from precise design <br />details. Therefore, I've found that the riprap delivered for both area 51 <br />and area 41 was adequate to meet the reasonable expectations of the design <br />specifications. <br />The design of bedding materials is similarly an empirical process. Bedding <br />functions to minimize the chances of the riprap material disappearing into <br />the underlying unclassified materials, minimize the opportunity for the <br />riprap to disappear into the bedding material itself and minimize the <br />probablility of washing bedding material from beneath the riprap. The <br />small deviations in the no. 4 and No. 200 size class for the bedding <br />material will not materially affect the performance against <br />criteria. Also, the quality and care of construction of tf <br />is much more important to channel stability than strict/ <br />numerical specifications. <br />~ence <br />,.~ ~ ~=1 <br />i~~ ,~ ~ <br />I ;h <br />'~ <br />J; <br />\,p QJ. <br />.i ~L% <br />-.~~,~t~c,x% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.