My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67486
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:13:14 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:53:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 09 SOIL BASELINE STUDY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 1 <br />Parameter, Procedure, and Reference Llst Used for <br />Soil Semple Analysis, Yoast Development Area, Routt County, t:olorado <br />Parameter-Units Procedure-Reference <br />Sample Preparation <br />Subsampling less than 2 mm fraction <br />Rock fragment content percent by volume <br />Preparation of saturation extract and saturation <br />percentage determination <br />pH (determination using saturated paste) <br />Conductivity of saturation extract in mmhos/cm at <br />25°C <br />soluble calcium, magnesium, and sodium in <br />meq/I <br />Sodium Adsorption Ratio <br />Exchangeable Sodium percentage (determined if <br />SAR is greater than 10) <br />Organic Matter in percent <br />Carbonate in percent <br />Particle size analysis in percent sand, silt, and <br />clay <br />Textural class'rfication <br />Sand Fractionation (very fine) <br />Samples were air dried at less than 35°C. Clods <br />were broken up prior to grinding and sieving the <br />sample. Large rock fragments were removed <br />and weighed. Sample material was sieved. <br />Remaining rock fragments left on the 10 mesh <br />(2 mm) sieve were removed and weighed. <br />Remaining soil clods left on the 10 mesh screen <br />were ground until the sample just passed the <br />screen. Excessive grinding of sample material <br />was avoided during the entire sample <br />preparation procedure. <br />U.S. Salinity Lab (1969), Method 1. <br />SCS Soil Survey Investigation Report No. 1, <br />Method 3B, page 18. <br />ASA Mono. No. 9, Part 2, (2 ed). 1982. <br />Method 10-2.3.1, page 169. <br />ASA Mono. No. 9, Part 2, (2 ed). 1982. Method <br />10-3.2, page 171. pH pertormed on saturation <br />paste, method 10-2.3.1, page 169. <br />ASA Mono. No. 9, Part 2, (2 ed). 1982. Method <br />10-3.3, pages 172-173. Use saturation paste <br />extract. <br />ASA Mono. No. 9, Part 2, (2 ed). 1982. Method <br />10-3.4. pages 173-174. <br />U.S. Salinity Lab (1969), p. 26. <br />U.S. Salinity Lab (1969), p. 26. <br />For OM <7.0%: CSU Tech Bulletin LT 888-2 <br />(1988) <br />For OM > 7.0%: Storer (1984) <br />ASA Mono. No. 9, Part 2, (2 ed). 1982. Method <br />11-2.4, pages 188-191. <br />Hydrometer method. Black et al. 1965. <br />Methods of soil analysis. ASA Mono No. 9, <br />Part 1, method 43-5, pages 562-566. <br />USDA (1951), p. 209. <br />ASA Mono. No. 9, Part 1, (2 ed). 1986. <br />Method 15-5.2.4, Pages 405 and 406. <br /> <br />• <br />• <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.