My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67351
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67351
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:13:08 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/2004
Doc Name
2.04.7 Hydrology Description
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />. The Upper Coal Member contains approximately 230 feet of interbedded shales, siltstones, <br />lenticular sandstones, and three persistent coal seams. These seams include the D, E, and F coal <br />seams. In portions of the Apache Rocks permit azea and all of the South of Divide permit <br />revision area, the E Seam is of significance in that it is of sufficient thickness and quality to be <br />mined. This stratigraphic member of the Mesaverde Formation lies between the underlying <br />marine sandstones (principally the Bowie Sandstone) and an overlying, similar but less <br />persistent, massive, cliff-forming discontinuous channel sandstone. <br />Groundwater inflows into the E Seam workings are expected to occur from two potential <br />sources: <br />1. Sandstone channels in and near the roof of the E Seam workings. <br />2. Fault-related inflows from the underlying Bowie Sandstone. <br />Extensive sandstone channels have been mapped above the E Seam in the South of Divide <br />permit revision area. The extent of these sandstone channels are represented in Exhibit <br />18B on Figure 17. Because 800 or more feet of overburden generally covers the channel <br />sandstones, it is unlikely that they have received appreciable recharge by vertical <br />infiltration from the overlying rocks or are in active hydraulic communication with either <br />surface water or near surface groundwater (Mayo and Associates, 1999). The most likely <br />recharge locations are along up-dip regions in the vicinity of Minnesota Creek and <br />possibly near the contact with the Mt. Gunnison intrusion. However no known sandstone <br />channel outcrops have been positively identified along the Minnesota Creek drainage due <br />to colluvial cover. While monitoring well data have documented saturation in these <br />. channels sandstones, appreciable quantities of water or unusual water pressures have not <br />been encountered in the numerous boreholes that have penetrated these channels. <br />Inflows from these sandstone channels aze expected to be minor, but in association with faults <br />such as the 14 HG could be as great as 500 gpm. Damaged zones associated with these fault <br />zones have the potential to locally increase both the permeability and storage capacity of the <br />sandstone channels thus potentially increasing roof inflows in the vicinity of the faults. Such <br />roof inflows aze not expected to persist for more than a few weeks (see Exhibit 18B). <br />Mayo and Associates Exhibit 18B describes the Bowie Sandstone as having a similar <br />depositional history and mineralogical composition to that of the Rollins Sandstone. As a <br />result, fault-related inflows from the Bowie Sandstone beneath the E Seam have the <br />potential to be as great as those associated with the Rollins Sandstone. However, given the <br />lack of continued significant roof inflows into the B Seam workings, it is thought that most, <br />if not all, of the saturation within the Bowie Sandstone near the fault zones encountered by <br />the B Seam workings has been drained. Only a few minor seeps discharge from Bowie <br />Sandstone outcrops between Sylvester Gulch and the Bear Mine. The absence of <br />appreciable spring discharges further supports the idea that the Bowie Sandstone is not <br />saturated. <br />Three of the six groundwater monitoring wells completed in the Upper Coal Member of the <br />Mesaverde Formation aze currently monitored. These wells include SOM-2-H, SOM-16-H, and <br />• SOM C-76, which are all completed in the F Seam. SOM-23-H-2 was completed in the E <br />Seam and removed from the monitoring program in June 1998. <br />1.04 -66 Revised November 2004 PRIO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.