My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67351
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67351
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:13:08 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/2004
Doc Name
2.04.7 Hydrology Description
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />'~ Assuming an average gradient of 0.05 in the mine workings, an avera~e horizontal porosity of 0.1 <br />(Mayo, 1998), and a horizontal connectivity of 1.0 x 10-0 to 1.0 x 10- ft/d, the average horizontal <br />seepage velocity in the Rollins Sandstone would range from 0.18 to 1.8 ftlyr. However, these <br />calculations have limited value for predicting flow rates in the compartmentalized Rollins <br />Sandstone. In the journal article Mayo and Koontz (2000) demonstrated that the Rollins Sandstone <br />groundwater systems, in the mine permit area, occur as hydraulically isolated bodies that are not <br />horizontally continuous. <br />In addition, Mayo and Koontz (2000) report horizontal hydraulic conductivity values for the <br />Rollins Sandstone from in-mine permeameter testing between 2.4 x 10-3 and 1.3 x 10-r ft/d. <br />These data show that, with the exception of the fractured portion of the formation, the <br />permeability of the Rollins Sandstone is low. In fact, Mayo (1998) states that of the fifteen <br />analyzed core samples taken from the Rollins Sandstone between the BEM and 14HG Faults, only <br />one "had sufficient permeability to transmit water" and "the low permeability of all other samples <br />make them effective barrier to groundwater flow." <br />This is further documented in the permit revision submittal and decision documents for the <br />Jumbo Mountain (PR-O5, 10/21/94), Apache Rocks (PR-06, 1/26/96), Box Canyon (PR-08, <br />1125/00)areas, where it is reported that drill holes which penetrated the Rollins Sandstone near the <br />Orchard Valley Mine (now Bowie No. 1 Mine) had an insufficient yield to sustain groundwater <br />supply wells. <br />. As discussed previously, groundwater monitoring wells completed in the Rollins Sandstone do not <br />provide reliable information on the groundwater systems within the unit (Mayo and Associates 1998 <br />and 1999). In addition, the groundwater systems aze not azeally extensive and not in hydrodynamic <br />communication with each other, For these reasons, MCC does not plan to continue monitoring or <br />complete any additional monitoring wells in the Rollins Sandstone, because it has concluded that <br />this formation does not produce sufficient quantities of groundwater for beneficial use. A review of <br />SEO permitted wells in the vicinity of the West Elk Mine confirms that there are no water wells <br />producing from the Rollins Sandstone. <br />However, the information obtained from Rollins Sandstone monitoring well observations <br />have played an important role in understanding the interaction of this major beach/offshore <br />bar deposited sand with the damaged zones associated with the BEM and 14HG Faults. From <br />these observations, Mayo and Associates Exhibit 18B has been able to make correlations to <br />the Bowie Sandstone (of similar depositional history, mineralogical composition, geometry, <br />and structural architecture to the Rollins Sandstone) as it relates to the proposed E Seam <br />mining in the South of Divide permit revision area. <br />• <br />1.04 -64 Revised Navem6er 1004 PRI G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.