My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67186
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67186
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:58 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:45:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/15/2006
Doc Name
Revegetation Success Criteria
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix TR-37
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I • 1.0 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM <br />The Colorado Surface Coal PvTining Reclamation Act (CRS 34-33-120 and 121) <br />performance standards require that reclamation establish "a diverse, effective, and <br />permanent vegetative cover of the same seasonal variety native to the azea of land to be <br />affected and capable of self-regeneration and plant succession at least equal in extent of <br />cover to the natural vegetation of the area." In implementing the provisions of the statute, <br />the constructors of the Colorado regulations concluded that in order to meet revegetation <br />success, reclaimed and revegetated areas must have a stabilizing cover of vegetation of the <br />same seasonal variety as that disturbed, and for those areas that are not cropland or to be <br />developed, herbaceous production, species diversity, and woody plant density equal to <br />that of the vegetation on the approved reference area or standards. <br />The overarching concern with using a reference area in evaluating the success of <br />revegetation centers on comparison of a native vegetation community with an <br />anthropogenic vegetation community. There are two predominant concerns with <br />comparing native vegetation communities with reclaimed vegetation communities; first, <br />the revegetated community has been developed on a significantly different (or altered) <br />physical environment, and second, revegetation success comparisons are being made <br />between a mature native vegetation community and an early seral stage vegetation <br />community. <br />• Revegetated communities on mined areas generally have a significantly different physical <br />environment. The geology and stratigraphy of the area has been altered through <br />fragmentation, extraction, and replacement. With the removal and replacement of the <br />rock layers, the topography of the reclaimed landscape has been changed, often creating a <br />more uniform landscape than that present prior to disturbance. The fragmentation, <br />removal, and replacement of the rock materials has altered the groundwater hydrologic <br />regime in the disturbance area, and likely has altered the surface water hydrology from the <br />standpoint of drainage location, drainage pattern complexity, and chemical composition of <br />the water. Removal, stockpiling, and replacement of topsoil or suitable plant growth <br />media changes the character of the original soil profile as well as the numbers and <br />character of macro- and microorganisms within the removed and replaced soil, including <br />the dormant seed bank. Lastly, the revegetated communities are young, representing eazly <br />seral stages in the development of the vegetation community, with significantly different <br />physiognomy and species composition than native communities of the reference areas. <br />The native vegetation communities that are being used as reference areas have their own <br />set of characteristics. Whether largely unaffected by man's presence or modified in the last <br />centuries, the native vegetation communities have developed over long periods of time, <br />generally hundreds or thousands of years. As a result of this lengthy development, the <br />vegetation communities are complex, in terms of numbers of species and their distribution <br />throughout the landscape. Native vegetation communities have adapted to the physical <br />• and biotic environment in macro- and microdistributional patterns, resulting in patchiness, <br />and distributions dependent on time of species arrival and competition. Contrasted to <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.