My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67136
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67136
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:44:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
NH1 TAB 11 ADDENDUM 11-1 WILDLIFE BASELINE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
during all ground activities were recorded on standard wildlife observation <br />• forms. All raptor observations and nest site locations were carefully mapped <br />on wildlife distribution maps. <br />Upland Gave Birds. Upland game birds observed during passerine transect <br />surveys and other wildlife studies, were recrorded by species, number, habitat, <br />location, and date. In addition, brood production surveys were conducted in <br />July, 1975 to determine the number of young birds and adults by species and <br />habitat. These surveys utilized the 0.5 km walking transects established for <br />passerine breeaing bird surveys (see Results, page 38). <br />Waterfowl. qualitative surveys to determine waterfowl nesting activity and <br />nest production at study area wet areas were conducted during raid-July, 1979. <br />Wet areas were visited during ear.Ly rro.rning hours and numbers of young birds <br />and adults were recorded by species and location (see Results, page 39). <br />N,igratory waterfowl and shorebird species are protected by the Pligratory <br />Bird Treaty Act; therefore, an inrnortant objective of the waterfowl program <br />was to identify and map all areas that are critical to waterfcn/1 survival in <br />the study area (if any) so that all su~.h areas can be monitored during mining <br />operations. <br />BIG GAME SURVEYS <br />Ground survey techniques and existing DOW data were utilized to determine the <br />presence, abundance, and heavy-use areas of mule deer on the study area <br />(see Results, page 40). All mule deer observations (and other wildlife <br />observations) obtained during all field activities were listed on wildlife <br />obser.~ation forms. Mule deer use areas identified during surveys and through <br />a compilation of observations and existing DOW data were studied on the <br />ground to determine what characteristics of the site made it more attractive <br />to mule deer than other sites. An example of site characteristics studied <br />at sites heavily utilized by (if any) mule deer folla~rs: <br />1. Topographic characteristics <br />a. Slope aspect and degree of slope <br />. b. Protection offered by topcgraplic conditions <br />-8- <br />JUN 1 1 1980 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.