My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67051
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67051
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:44 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:41:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/2004
Doc Name
2.05.6(3)(a-c) Protection of Hydrological Balance Part 2
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mrne <br />• (i.e., projections are to The east of the mine workings). These fault zones do, however, project <br />into the F Seam workings of the Hawks Nest Mine (east of the Sanborn Creek Mine) which <br />neither encountered these faults zones nor experienced any significant groundwater inflows. <br />MCC believes that the water-bearing BEM and 14HG fault systems are unique to West Elk Mine <br />and, as a result, do not extend any significant distance away firm the pemut azea. As a result, the <br />proposed storage of water within the Box Canyon Sealed Sumps is not expected to increase <br />groundwater inflows within the abandoned downgradient mine workings primarily due to the low <br />permeability of the coal and the lack of hydraulic connection between the mines via the fault <br />systems. <br />• In January 1997, MCC appropriated the nontributary groundwater fault inflows and <br />sump storage areas. MCC adjudicated these rights by decree (Case Nos. 97CW242, <br />97CW243 and 97CW244) through the Division 4 Court system in 1999. <br />• MCC obtained approval for the Lone Pine Gulch pipeline discharge point (Outfall #013) to <br />dischazge mine water from the NW Panels sealed sump. The quality of the water within the <br />sump was evaluated and found to be of sufficient quality so as not to require ,additional <br />treatment prior to discharge to Lone Pine Gulch. <br />• MCC constructed a 2,000 gpm pumping facility in Sylvester Gulch in August 2000 for <br />mine water outflow waters. The facility was designed to allow for rapid expansion, <br />including a treatment system if necessary. <br />In short, the BEM Fault inflow in March 1996 and the 14HG Fault inflow in January 1997, <br />prompted MCC to take many aggressive steps to improve mine inflow management. <br />At the present time, seven southwest to northeast trending fault systems have been <br />identified in the West Elk Mine permit area. More specifically, the faults generally trend <br />N60E to N70E with dip angles of 70° to 85°. This orientation is parallel to subparallel to the <br />dominant joint set at N58E to N64E. The tectonic faults are believed to have formed by <br />activating the existing joint system to form the fault zones. Four of these fault systems have <br />been encountered by previous mining. These include the unnamed fault at the bottom of <br />the entry slopes in the B Seam, the BEM Fault, the 14HG Fault and the "Oliver" Fault that <br />was encountered in the Oliver Mine near Sylvester Gulch. Three additional parallel fault <br />systems (named the West Flat-Iron, Deep Creek and Gunnison) have been identified by <br />drill holes, seismic or analytical techniques. Each is located approximately 2,000 feet apart <br />and with dip angles greater than 70° to the northwest. <br />Coal exploration drilling has not encountered fault zones or associated fault waters. The <br />near vertical nature of the faults, the diminishing displacement of the faults as they <br />approach the surface, the vertical aspect of coal exploration holes, and the inability to <br />precisely pinpoint undrained faults makes interception with drilling difficult and unlikely. <br />A single surface methane drainage well was drilled across a known fault zone using <br />directional drilling methods. The hole successfully vented methane but did not encounter <br />water. <br />U <br />2.05-214 Revised November 2004 PR/0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.