My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE66902
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE66902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:37 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:35:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994121
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/30/1995
Doc Name
LUCIO VASQUEZ QUARRY 2 FN M-94-121 ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
LUCIO VASQUEZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />mock to be backfilled into the excavation? What is the push <br />'~ distance and slope of the push? <br />~re you committing to follow the Soil Conservation District's <br />recommendations as contained in a letter from Norman Wells dated <br />July 15, 1994? <br />ease describe why the only grading required will occur on the <br />southern portion of the site. Is waste rock from the entire quarry <br />going to be transported to the south area? Also, what are the <br />estimated costs for revegetation? How many acres will be <br />revegetated? <br />4. Exhibit E - Please accurately locate the outline of the cliff <br />and the drainage adjacent to the quarry area on both Mining and <br />Reclamation Plan Maps. <br />;Please show the topographic contours of the reclaimed topography on <br />(\ the Exhibit E Map. <br />Exhibit F - Is a permit required for this site from Boulder <br />County? <br />Exhibit H - Is the municipality of the town of Lyons within a <br />2.mile radius of the site? <br />To adequately review you response to the adequacy review, the <br />Division must receive the required information by February 2, 1995. <br />If we do not receive the required information by that date, a new <br />date may be set for consideration of the revision application as <br />provided under Rule 1.5(2). Also, as provided for under Rule 1.5.1 <br />all changes and additions to the revision application must be filed <br />with the Division. Any change or addition to the revision <br />application shall constitute an amended filing for the purposes of <br />determining the date for the consideration of the application by <br />the Division, and for the deadline for a final decision on the <br />application. Within five (5) working days of an amended filing, <br />the Division shall set a new date for the consideration of the <br />revision application. <br />If you are unable to fully respond to this letter, providing all <br />required information prior to the scheduled Board consideration <br />date of February 6, 1995, please contact me requesting a <br />continu nce of Board consideration to a later date. <br />Sin Yely, <br />William C. Yo~Feirn <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />c:\wp51\vasq.adq <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.