My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE66808
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE66808
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:33 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:33:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/20/1999
Doc Name
TR 1 TO APPLICATION GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY UPPER PLANT SITE
From
AMERICAN SODA
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M98168GE • <br />consolidation teats were <br />identify the swell poten <br />results were not used to <br />analysis discussed below <br />the formational material <br />strength testa performed <br />material. <br />performed on the samples tested to help <br />:ial of the samples tested however the test <br />predict settlement. The settlement <br />was based on the modulus of elasticity of <br />calculated from an unconfined compressive <br />of a rock core sample of the formational <br />We understand that you require modulus of subgrade reaction to <br />design concrete foundation members for tolerable deflections. We <br />suggest that you consider a modulus of subgrade reaction of 20,000 <br />kips per cubic foot. The modulus of subgrade reaction was calcu- <br />lated from the laboratory stress strain curve from the unconfined <br />compressive strength test and is approximate. We suggest that the <br />modulus of subgrade reaction be verified by plate load tests prior <br />to construction. <br />The site soil samples tested have a measured swell pressure leas <br />than about 100 to 250 pounds per square foot. This swell pressure <br />was measured for soils at the initial moisture content of the soil <br />sample tested. The measured swell pressure may be inf:uenced by <br />disturbance of the sample during the sampling operation an3 the <br />soil suction potential. <br />Changes in the initial moisture content will significantly influ- <br />ence the swell pressure of the site soils. if the initial moisture <br />content of the foundation soils is less than that of the test <br />sample the actual awe'_1 pressures will likely be significantly <br />higher than measured. If the initial moisture content of the <br />foundation soils is greater than that of the teat sample the actual <br />swell pressures may be less than measured. <br />The bottom of the foundation excavations should be thoroughly <br />cleaned and observed by the project Geotechnical Engineer or his <br />representative when excavated. Any loose or disturbed material <br />exposed in the foundation excavation should be removed or remedied <br />prior to additional construction. <br />We recommend that we be contacted to observe the foundation <br />excavations and backfill operations during construction to verify <br />the soil support conditions and our assumptions upon which our <br />recommendations are based. If necessary we may revise our recom- <br />mendations based on our observations. we are available to provide <br />material testing services during the construction phase of the <br />project. <br />13 <br />lambert ana S~,o~ociaten <br />COYIYLTIMO O[OT[OMYIC~I lYOlMllp •YO <br />Y ~}111Y1L IElfIYO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.