Laserfiche WebLink
is very low in this area or the well is poorly developed. <br />Well P-5 was pumped for one hour at an average rate of 2.3 gpm. The re- <br />covery of this well produced a transmissivity of 680 gpd/ft for the sand- <br />stone above the G seam (Second White Sandstone). Table 2.7-32 and Figure <br />2.7-35 present the recovery test of well P-5. <br />The pump silted up during the start of the pump test on well P-6. The well <br />was bailed at a steady rate of 2.5 gpm for 12 minutes. Table 2.7-33 gives <br />the basic data of this test while Figure 2.7-36 presents the recovery plot. <br />The analysis of this recovery indicated a transmissivity of 1500 gpd/ft. <br />Recovery of well P-8 was evaluated after bailing for 11 minutes at an average <br />rate of 4.5 gpm. The recovery indicated a transmissivity of 8500 gpd/ft for <br />the sandstone below the G coal seam (Third White Sandstone.) Table 2.7-34 and <br />Figure 2.7-37 present the data for this well. <br />Table 2.7-35 presents a summary of the aquifer properties for the wells. <br />These tests show that the aquifers in the Flume and Pyeatt Gulches contain <br />relatively high transmissivities in these areas. The thin sandstone in the <br />Lewis Shale near well P-3 has a significant transmissivity of 2400 gpd /f t. <br />This test also showed that the Lewis Shale sandstone in this area is connected <br />to the Pyeatt fill hydrologically. Transmissivities of the sandstone above <br />the G coal seam varied from 0.6 to 1500 gpd/ft while a transmissivity of 700 <br />gpd/ft is probably more representative of the aquifer. A transmissivity of <br />. 8500 gpd/ft was computed for the sandstone below the G coal seam. <br />2-561 <br />