Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br />the following sections: <br />T4N, R93W - Sections 10, 11, 15, 16, 20, 21, 27, 28. <br />TSN, R91W - Sections 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 32. <br />TSN, R92W - Sections 1 - 5, 7 - 12, 18, 19, 20, 24, 29 - 36. <br />TSN, R93W - Sections 25, 35, 36. <br />T6N, R91W - Sections 7, 8, 16, 18, 20, 21, 29, 30, 31. <br />T6N, R92W - Sections 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 26, 27, 33, 34. <br />The general locations of the alternate railroad corridors and the mine <br />site are shown in Figure 1. <br />1.3 PROJECT ORGANIZATION <br />The Offlce of the State Archeologist of Colorado, with James J. Hester <br />as acting State Archeologist, was contacted on 3 April 1975 by VTN Colorado, <br />Inc. concerning an inventory of the cultural and paleontological resources <br />of the proposed W. R. Grace b Co. coal haul railroad corridors and the <br />Colowyo Mine site. On 18 April 1975 Hester supplied VTN with a cost esti- <br />mate of the cultural and paleontological resources inventory, and Joseph J. <br />Lischka, an archeologist on the faculty of the University of Colorado, was <br />• suggested as principal investigator. On 1 May 1975, Permit No. 75-EM-008 <br />was received from the Department of the Interior to conduct archeological <br />and paleontological investigations on lands owned and controlled by the <br />Department of the Interior and administered by the Bureau of Land Manage- <br />ment. The permit was granted for a period of 45 days, from 2 May 1975 to <br />15 June 1975. At the same time, a prospective crew was lined up and <br />equipment necessary for the survey was made ready. Due to unspecified <br />delays, however, the contract authorizing expenditures for the investiga- <br />lion was not received until 2 June 1975 and several more days were required <br />to set up an account for the investigation at the University of Colorado. <br />As originally outlined in the Scope of Work supplied by VTN, the <br />investigation was to have been conducted in two phases. Phase 1 con- <br />sisted of an assessment of known cultural and paleontological resources <br />based on a review of literature and site records and preliminary field <br />observation of the project area. Insufficient lead time and delay in <br />receipt of the contract, however, required that the Phase 1 investigation <br />be conducted coincident with and after completion of the Phase 2 field <br />• investigation. The contract delay also caused difficulties in obtaining <br />