Laserfiche WebLink
P$RIODZC INSPECTION FORM <br />9tockponds or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Rov Karo <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Stockoond <br />SITE NAME: T-1 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II <br />MINE I.D. NO.: C-80-005 <br />DATE: 06/19/95 <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 03/31/95 <br />LOCATION: SES:SW3:. Sec 2. TSN, R87W <br />LOCATION: 7.1 mi SE of Hayden, CO <br />OWNER'S REP.: Scott Williams. Gen Mor <br />Circle or write in annrooriata resDOnae <br />1. Angle of slope: 3:1 upstream, 4:1 downstream Total = 7:1 N/A <br />2. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes ® N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes ©o N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes ~ N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes ~ N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes ®° N/A <br />3. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes ~ N/A <br />4. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes ® N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes ~ N/A <br />6. *Major erosion problems: es No N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes No N/A <br />8. *£rosion of toe: Yes ®° N/A <br />9. *Water impounded against downstream toe: Yes ©o N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: Anoroximately ~_ feet <br />11. Increase Decrease in water level: No chance feet <br />12. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes No N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: Yes No N/A <br />14. *Clogging <br /> Spillway channels: Yes ~ N/A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes o N/A <br />*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse conditions <br />noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, etc.) in the <br />space on the back of this sheet. <br />