Laserfiche WebLink
_; <br />Memo-Roger Funston <br />February 22, 1980 <br />Page -3- <br />3) Possible changes in groundwater movement, either from <br />the presence of abandoned mine workings, subsidence, or <br />both. <br />4) Following abandonment, underground working would slowly <br />fill with water until some sort of equilibrium is reached. <br />How long would this process take? <br />MONITORING - <br />1) The mine plan monitoring program should be shosvn on map <br />with a scale mare suitable than that of moo III-II. <br />2) It is unclear if the applicant intends to monitor both <br />alluvial and bedrock groundwater. Identify all ground- <br />water monitoring points by aquifer. Monitoring should <br />be provided for all six aquifers. <br />3) The groundwater monitoring program should include the <br />monthly recording of water ieveT. <br />STREAM BUFFER ZONES - The application should request a variance <br />from the buffer zone requirement. Discussion should include <br />measures taken to protect the hydrologic balance of the ldilTiams <br />Fork River. <br />ALLUVIAL VALLEY FLOORS - The application does not contain sufficient <br />detail to allow the Division to make a formal alluvial valley floor <br />determination, identify essential hydrologic functions, and make a <br />determination on material damages. The applicant should provide further <br />information as required under Section 785.19 of the proposed permanent <br />regulations. The applicant should obtain a copy of OSM's draft <br />technical guidance paper for Alluvial Valley Floor Identification and <br />Study. In the meantime, we should identify both the Williams Fork and <br />Yampa River valleys as probable alluvial valley floors. <br />CUMULATIVE ASSESSPIENT - Section 786.19(c) of the proposed permanent <br />regulations requires "the assessment of the probable cumulative impacts <br />of all anticipated coal mining in the general area on the hydrologic <br />balance, ." At present, the Division does not have a sufficient <br />data base to make this assessment. Therefore, in terms of hydrologic <br />impacts I do not see any way that the Division can sign off under a <br />"permanent program review" until.we have reviewed Utah International's <br />surface and underground submittals. <br />Tyro other areas, approximate original contours and a stabilization plan <br />for the Williams Fork River, has not yet been reviewed. I will provide <br />you with that analysis early next week. <br />Given the current state of the submittal (i.e. incomplete), the hydrology <br />section will be rereviewed after the requested infonna.tion has been <br />received. I may have further questions at that time. <br />