My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO28393
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO28393
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:36 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:21:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/22/1980
Doc Name
MEMO HYDROLOGY FOR EMPIRE ENERGY CO 10 1979 SUBMITTAL
From
MLR
To
ROGER FUNSTON
Permit Index Doc Type
CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_; <br />Memo-Roger Funston <br />February 22, 1980 <br />Page -3- <br />3) Possible changes in groundwater movement, either from <br />the presence of abandoned mine workings, subsidence, or <br />both. <br />4) Following abandonment, underground working would slowly <br />fill with water until some sort of equilibrium is reached. <br />How long would this process take? <br />MONITORING - <br />1) The mine plan monitoring program should be shosvn on map <br />with a scale mare suitable than that of moo III-II. <br />2) It is unclear if the applicant intends to monitor both <br />alluvial and bedrock groundwater. Identify all ground- <br />water monitoring points by aquifer. Monitoring should <br />be provided for all six aquifers. <br />3) The groundwater monitoring program should include the <br />monthly recording of water ieveT. <br />STREAM BUFFER ZONES - The application should request a variance <br />from the buffer zone requirement. Discussion should include <br />measures taken to protect the hydrologic balance of the ldilTiams <br />Fork River. <br />ALLUVIAL VALLEY FLOORS - The application does not contain sufficient <br />detail to allow the Division to make a formal alluvial valley floor <br />determination, identify essential hydrologic functions, and make a <br />determination on material damages. The applicant should provide further <br />information as required under Section 785.19 of the proposed permanent <br />regulations. The applicant should obtain a copy of OSM's draft <br />technical guidance paper for Alluvial Valley Floor Identification and <br />Study. In the meantime, we should identify both the Williams Fork and <br />Yampa River valleys as probable alluvial valley floors. <br />CUMULATIVE ASSESSPIENT - Section 786.19(c) of the proposed permanent <br />regulations requires "the assessment of the probable cumulative impacts <br />of all anticipated coal mining in the general area on the hydrologic <br />balance, ." At present, the Division does not have a sufficient <br />data base to make this assessment. Therefore, in terms of hydrologic <br />impacts I do not see any way that the Division can sign off under a <br />"permanent program review" until.we have reviewed Utah International's <br />surface and underground submittals. <br />Tyro other areas, approximate original contours and a stabilization plan <br />for the Williams Fork River, has not yet been reviewed. I will provide <br />you with that analysis early next week. <br />Given the current state of the submittal (i.e. incomplete), the hydrology <br />section will be rereviewed after the requested infonna.tion has been <br />received. I may have further questions at that time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.