Laserfiche WebLink
Pit 5, had red soil staining associated with the discharges, therefore samples <br />GGS-1 and GGS-2 were taken, respectively. These have been submitted to an <br />analytical laboratory to analyze for Total Iron and Total Dissolved Solids. These <br />springs were absorbed into the soil prior to entering any surface drainages. <br />Laboratory resuks have not been received as of July 15, 1991. Spring 3, also <br />near Pit 5, was associated with a slump located along the south slope of Pond <br />5/6 and was discharging directly to the sediment pond. Pond 5/6 was <br />discharging at the time of this survey. <br />All of the springs except Spring 4, which was associated with Pit 6, were found <br />both down slope and down geologic dip from the spoils. The spring farthest <br />from the related spoil area was Spring 5 which was approximately 400 ft. west of <br />the Pit 2 western perimeter. It was, however, located in a natural drainage which <br />could drain groundwaters from the spoil. <br />No problems or anomalous conditions were associated with the seeps or springs <br />near Pits 2, 4, or 6. All of the springs identified in this survey were draining to <br />roadside ditches with no evidence of significant associated erosion. <br />