My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO28372
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO28372
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:35 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:20:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
4/19/2004
Doc Name
Exhibit 7 NPDES Permit
From
Colorado Health Department of Public Health & Environment
To
Mountain Coal Company
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mountain Coal and Beaz Coal Water Quality Assessment CO-0038776 and CO-0044377 <br />Because the low flow (QI) for Sylvester Gulch, West Sylvester Gulch, the Dry Fork of Minnesota <br />Creek and Lone Pine Gulch is zero, the assimilative capacities of these receiving streams for the <br />pollutants of concern aze equal to the in-stream water quality standards. <br />The upstream background pollutant concentrations used in the mass-balance equation will varybased <br />on the regulatory definition of existing ambient water quality. For most pollutants, existing quality is <br />determined to be the 85a' percentile. For metals in the total recoverable form, existing quality is <br />detemuned to be the SOs' percentile. For pathogens such as fecal coliform, existing quality is <br />determined to be the geometric mean. <br />For non-conservative pazameters and ammonia, the mass-balance equation is not as applicable and <br />thus other approaches aze considered where appropriate. Note that conservative pollutants aze <br />pollutants that aze modeled as if mass is conserved and there is no degradation, whereas non- <br />conservativepollutants degrade and sometimes are created within a receiving stream depending on <br />stream conditions. Amore detailed discussion of the technical analysis for these pazameters is <br />provided in the pages that follow. <br />Pollutants Evaluated <br />The following pazameters were identified by the WQCD as pollutants to be evaluated for this <br />facility: <br />• Metals (Outfalls 004, 011, 012, 013, 016, and 017 for Mountain Coal; and'Outfa11001 for <br />Bear Goal) <br />•' Ammonia (Oritfa11004 for Mountain Coal) <br />• Fecal Coliform (Outfa11004 for Mountain Coal) <br />• Chlorine (Outfa11004 for Mountain Coal). <br />During assessment of the facility, nearby facilities, and receiving stream water quality, no additional <br />pazameters were identified as pollutants of concern. <br />Mountain Coal Company: The Mountain Coal Company LLC, West Elk Mine is located in the NE <br />1/4, Section 16, T13S, R90W; 38° 55' 30" north latitude,107° 2T 00" west longitude; approximately <br />one mile east of Somerset, CO, on Highway 133 in Gunnison County. The long-term average <br />reported design capacity of the mine water discharges from Outfalls 004 and 016 to the North Fork <br />of the Gunnison River is 0.142 MGD (0.22 cfs). Note that while this value is less than half of the <br />long-term average determined using the facility's most recent data, it is used in later assimilative <br />capacity calculations because it is expected to represent long term conditions. Note that this value <br />includes effluent from the domestic WWTF (Internal Outfall 007), with a design flow of 0.0105 <br />MGD (0.016 cfs), which is combined in Pond MB-2R with other sources and dischazged to the North <br />Fork of the Gunnison River via Outfa11004. <br />Wastewater treatment is accomplished using non-aerated lagoons and sedimentation in underground <br />sumps. The technical analyses that follow for discharges to the North Fork of the Gunnison River <br />include assessments of the assimilative capacity based on the total combined design capacity that <br />includes Beaz Coal Company's Outfa11001 as discussed below. <br />Appendix A Page 12 of 20 Last Revised 3/9/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.