Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rule 6.4.14 Exhibit N- Source of Leeal Right to Enter <br />35. Please be aware that easement holders of property throughout the permit area need to meet the same <br />requirements as the surface owners. Specifically, easement holders need to be identified on a Map, <br />provide documentation of legal right of entry into the easement property, and notify all easement <br />holders within 200 feet of the affected azea of the mining and reclamation activity. <br />36. The Division received two letters from easement holders regarding the proposed operation from <br />Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and from HS Resources, Inc. Please respond to the concerns noted in <br />the two letters and submit documentation regazding the applicant's legal right to enter and mine <br />through the easements. <br />Rule 6.4.19 Exhibit S- Permanent Man-Made Structures <br />/37. The Division received a letter from the Colorado Historical Society stating that two sites, SWL870 <br />and SWL814 are located within the boundaries of the proposed gravel pit, and one is in the process <br />of being listed on the State Register of Historic Places. Please address how these structures will be <br />protected from the mining and reclamation plan as required by Rule 6.4.19. <br />38. The application in Exhibits D and E describes setbacks from property boundaries and structures, <br />particulazly gas/oil wells and pipelines. However, in Exhibit S the application states that no mining <br />will occur within 200 feet of any structures until the Applicant demonstrates that mining will not <br />affect them or until an agreement is reached with owners of structures to allow mining within 200 <br />feet. If agreements aze forged with persons having an interest in the structures, and the agreements <br />are drafted in the format required by Rule 6.4.19 and Section 34-32.5-115(4)(e), C.R.S., the <br />Division's concerns will be satisfied and the setbacks specified in the agreements will be approved. <br />If agreements cannot be reached with persons having an interest in the structures, Rule 6.4.19 <br />provides the option for the Applicant to prepaze an engineering evaluation demonstrating that the <br />proposed mine plan will be protective of the structures. The application states that the depth of <br />mining will be on the order of 45 feet and up to 60 feet. Where setbacks are discussed, a distance of <br />25 feet from gas/oil wells and pipelines is specified. If actual dredge mining or conventional mining <br />were to occur up to a 25-foot setback line with a near vertical 4~ to 60 foot mine face, the integrity <br />of the structure to be protected would be threatened. The Division will not accept a 25-foot setback <br />from the mining face to critical structures for a pit depth of 45 to 60 feet unless an acceptable <br />engineering demonstration of stability is provided. The application appears to address this issue in <br />Exhibit D where it is stated that: <br />When a dredge is used the native materials tend to sluff off the banks and asszzme an angle of <br />repose oJ2% h to Iv. This happens because the material in this area is unconsolidated and <br />vertical slopes can not be maintained as mining occzzrs. This means that to maintain a setback of <br />100 jeer when the gravel is 60 feet thick that mining line has to be no less than 7~ feet inside the <br />setback lines to allow for the sloughing. <br /> <br />