PERMFILE66277

• Permit No: C1984062
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 12/11/2001
• Section_Exhibit Name: EXHIBIT 4 ‎(Part 1 )‎ NPDES PERMITS CO-0027154 & COG-850013
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

•
P:1RT i i
Page 13 of 19
:1. .`L1.`aGE?r'~T iLQUiREa VTS (CG'rlTIYIJED)
7, Upsets
a) Effect of an upset
~n upset constitutes an a:i_rWa*_ive defense to an action brought
for noncompl?ante with permit effluent Lmitatieas i_' the
requirements of paragraph (b) of this section are met. Yo
determination made duria3 administrative review of claims that
noncompliance was caused Sy upset, and before an action for
noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to
judicial revie:a. .
b) Conditions necessar;~ 'or a demonstration of upset
:1 permittee wha w15h95 t0 es tabLs:-1 the affirmative defense of
upset shall demonstrate through properly sioaed contain?oraneous
operating logs, or other relevant zv_cencz that:
•
(i) :~a upset cccarred and teat rile ;ermitLee can identify
t::e specific cause(s) o: t e u?sat;
(ii) The per~itted ;aci'_ity :+as at to ti~a Szir.~ proer'_
oceratea; and
(ill) T::e ^yermlCC2e sLL7mitteC :'.OC1Ce 0. the n75et a5 r2gU~red
in Part ii ~.3 Of L:15 nerC1L (_+-.:OCr CO CiCe).
(iv) The permittee coin?lied with ~ _emec_ai moasures
regal=ed under Section i_~.~(d) of t..,, federal
regula[io:.s.
c) 3urder. o= 72oof
_. am: e^fOrC.e_enL procee__ng ['~.e permittee seei-, LO esta5l'_s`..
C.e CCCnL_2::CB OC ._ __ 1135 Lae ~`U r_'en o_° 0.00=.
8. .e_o'~ef S:Ssta::cis
~O L'_~~5. StL'"]"25. 7C CC.:Cr =0__'l C_'..^.CS _C_~.~. _.. __c .O Gr92 JC
~.:a..ers of t.zz JLaCC.
•