Laserfiche WebLink
.::.' ~ ~ <br />.CONCLUSION <br />As can be seen from t3ze foregoing reclamation of the <br />permit area is not a viable concept. Rather the operation <br />should be more correctly viewed as an extraction of sand and <br />gragel performed in such a manner that the creek will be allowed <br />to replenish the sand and gravel deposits during its various <br />flood stages. The present condition of the permit site will <br />~ actually be maintained at its present status through a combination <br />of natures forces aided and assisted by the efforts of the permit <br />holder to prevent erosion and to further prevent any change in <br />the natrual water flow with 8 Mile Creek. If any areas on the <br />banks of the creek or in the bed of the creek appear to present <br />themself for reclamaton, the permit holder will consult with the <br />department of reclamation and the United States Government Soil _.. <br />Conservation Service in an attempt to establish native vegetation <br />in the area. <br />It should further be pointed out that no form of aquatic <br />etation of aquatic wildlife presently lives in 8 toile Creek and <br />nothing purposed by the permit ap~nt will interfere with the <br />r <br />wildlife in the area. <br />7'1- <br />Respectfully submitted this day of October, 1979. <br />Y D ALLEN ~E50 2 <br />Attorney for Applicant ~~ <br />Box 166 <br />Canon City, CO 81212 <br />(303 275-7593 <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />-3- <br />i` <br />