My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE66247
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE66247
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:08 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:14:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001023
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/14/2001
Doc Name
CAMILLETTI & SONS INC CAMILLETTI MILNER PIT 2 FILE M-2001-023
From
LETTUNICH VANDERBLOEMEN LLC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />_____ <br />LETTUN III IIIIIIIIIIIII III -OEMEN. LLc <br />999 _AW <br />ALPINE OFFICE BUILDING <br />200 LINCOLN AVENUE. SUITE 300 TELEPnoNE <br />P.O. BOx 773990 le>ol e>s oloo <br />ANTHONY B. LEITUNICM STEAMBOAT SPRINGS. COLORADO 80477 TELECOPIER <br />JOHN A VANDERBLOEMEN 19)01 670 0960 <br />June 14, 2001 <br />Division of Mineral and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Attention: Tom Schreiner <br />RE: Camilletti & Sons Inc., Camilletti Milner Pit #2, File M-2001-023 <br />Dear Mr. Schreiner: <br />Our office represents Camilletti & Sons Inc. concerning the above referenced <br />gravel pit project. This letter is in response to the Memo to you from Allen <br />Sorenson dated May 29, 2001 concerning mining setbacks. At page two of the <br />memo, Allen Sorenson indicates that a complicating factor with the establishment <br />of the mining setback of the powerline easement boundary specific to the site is <br />that there is some confusion as to the width of the easement. The memo goes on to <br />state that "the permit application states that the property deed references a 40 foot <br />wide easement, but the electric utility claims that the easement is 100 feet wide. <br />No documentary evidence for either of the claims is provided in the permit <br />application; as a result, for permitting purposes, the division must assume a 100 <br />foot wide easement unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the <br />Division, in consultation with the Attorney General's Office, that 40 feet is the <br />correct easement width." <br />The intent of this letter is to eliminate the confusion as to the width of the <br />easement. I have enclosed a copy of the only documentary evidence concerning <br />the width of the easement, the Transmission Line Right of Way Easement dated <br />1966 and recorded March 7, 1996 in Book 718 at Page 320 of the Routt County <br />public records. This document grants aright-of-way from Camilletti & Sons, Inc. <br />to Yampa Valley Electric Association for the installation of a transmission line and <br />the right "to cut and trim trees and shrubbery located within 20 feet of the center <br />line of said line." This clearly grants Y.V.E.A. a 40 foot wide easement. Nowhere <br />in the document is there any reference to a 100 foot wide easement. <br />If I can answer any further questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate <br />to call me. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.