My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO28274
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO28274
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:31 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:12:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973021
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/11/1976
Doc Name
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CASE M75 COOLEY GRAVEL CO
From
DNR
To
JEFFERSON CNTY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ r <br />DRAFT <br />JWR/amr <br />2/10/76 <br />Jefferson County Board of Adjustment <br />SUBJECT: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CASE I1M75 <br />COOLEY GRAVEL COMPANY <br />Gtintlemen: <br />Hopefully, the following answers your questions concerning the terrace edges <br />and the.size of the reclamation bond. First, it would not be imposeiible to round <br />the edges or to blast off the sharp corners on the edge of the benches or ter- <br />races. However, the Board feels thaC it would be inadvisable. The benches serve <br />an important safety measure for two reasons. The benches provide greater overall <br />stability to the entire cut slope. They also provide a trapping mechanism for <br />rocks which, from natural or manmade causes, may be dislodged from the cut face-or <br />overlying slopes and would tend to fall, bound'or roll down the slopes. Rounding <br />the edges would decrease the width of these benches. The drilling and blasting <br />required to remove the sharp edges would be expensive as well as somewhat danger- <br />ous in itsel~, add would decrease the stability of the slope. In our opinion, <br />the added safety risks and the additional costs are not merited by the possible <br />aesthetic improvement of the appearance of the cut slopes. <br />Secondly, the $55,000 bond was based on $1,000 per acre. It was believed <br />at the time that the bond was set that this would represent the actual costs of <br />reclamation if the state or a third party would have to take over the operation <br />and perform the necessary reclamation. It was believed at the time I:hat grading <br />and large scale shaping of the surfaces would be essentially completed during <br />eacfi stage of the operation so that the majority of reclamation costs would be <br />related to revegetation, and that adequate reclamation could be performed on <br />the site for $55,000. Even now, it would seem that the county's estimate of <br />$250,000 is unreasonably high, and it would not be needed to perform adequate <br />reclamation of the site if a third party would be required during any stage of the <br />quarry operation to stay in and carry out reclamation. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.