Laserfiche WebLink
16 <br />• 100 sites, provides a unique opportunity to address reseazch questions that would not otherwise <br />be applicable if the database was approached on a site-by-site basis. Since the timing of design <br />work for the various mine facilities may not be conducive to impact-specific mitigation in some <br />instances, the reseazch design will be structured to focus on sites that hold the greatest potential <br />for contributing data to address questions and issues raised by the reseazch design, rather than <br />being limited to impact-specific situations. <br />Altemative Site Discovery <br />Portions of the floor of Lorencito Canyon aze such that surface inventory is not an <br />adequate meansof site discovery. Holocene sediments aze up to several meters deep in the valley <br />floor, and represent several different depositional environments, including overbank terrace <br />deposits, alluvial fan deposits, and colluvial deposits deriving from the valley sides. Soil profiles <br />suggest one or several periods of surface stability. Cultural materials have been commonly found <br />in azeas of the valley floor where cutbanks, eroded azeas, or others locations with surface <br />disturbance expose surface and subsurface sediments. Surface visibility, however, is poor to non- <br />existent where such exposures aze not present. For these reasons, it is suspected that cultural <br />materials may be preserved in well-sealed deposits and under surfaces that lack visibility. Some <br />form of alternative site discovery is appropriate. <br />Several considerations aze key to a plan for alternative site discovery. Discovery will need <br />to be done by means of test excavations, rather than through monitoring. The nature and timing <br />• of this project precludes monitoring as a reasonable means of site discovery, simply because of <br />the potential for significant and expensive disruption to the construction process. Site discovery <br />by test excavations can be very expensive, so limitation of costs is critical. MAC will propose <br />a plan whereby portions of the Lorencito Canyon floor will be sampled, based on the location <br />of proposed impacts, the nature of deposits, and the availability of surface and subsurface <br />exposures. Auger probing and possible backhoe trenches appeaz to be the most efficient means <br />for revealing significant cultural deposits in the settings of concern. In order to provide a limit <br />to costs, the proposal will include anot-to-exceed number of probes and/or lineaz feet of backhoe <br />trenching, which will be adequate to conduct site discovery according to the identified sampling <br />strategy, but sufficiently flexible to adjust for unanticipated situations. It will be of great benefit <br />to have the haul road corridor, the proposed realignments of the existing road, the rail spur <br />corridor, the load out facilities, and the Pl/P2 box cut facilities identified on the ground at the <br />time this is conducted so that testing can be duected at azeas to be impacted. <br />Native American Consultation <br />Native American consultation has begun with letters sent to representatives of seven tribes. <br />Barring written response, MAC will attempt to contact all representatives by phone over the <br />course of December of 1996 to ascertain what concerns or interests, if any, they have in the <br />azchaeological resources within this project azea. In consultation with the Colorado SHPO, all <br />expressed concerns or interests will be accommodated to the extent possible under the most recent <br />amendments of the National Historic Preservation Act. <br />u <br />