Laserfiche WebLink
• Table 1 Summary of auger probing <br /> <br />site number probes comments <br />SLA7003 10 probes @ 10 m intervals one probe recovered a gray felsite flake tool, another probe <br /> across southeast edge of site had a piece of rabbit-sized long bone of unknown age or <br /> origin; additional testing warranted <br />SLA7186 6 probes @ 10 m intervals four of six probes positive for prehistoric cultural materials <br /> across site west of adobe (all flakes), four of six probes positive for historic materials <br /> structure (metal, glass, ceramics, bone), Holocene sediments over 2 <br /> m deep in some places; additional testing warranted <br />SLA7187 10 probes @ 10 m intervals probes to 170 curbs in places, four probes positive with <br /> through site and extending to historic materials, no prehistoric materials; no further work <br /> west-southwest out of site <br />SLA7196 20 probes @ 5 m intervals in four probes positive for cultural materials (6 Flakes, t biface <br />two intersecting transects fragment), three clustered in area of surface artifact concen- <br />tration, probes averaged 30 cm deep, Holocene sediments <br />up to 70 to 80 crabs in places; additional testing warranted <br />SLA7208 21 probes @ 5 m intervals in one positive probe (I flake, I flake tool), near surface con- <br />two trartsects centration exposed by plowing, Holocene sediments up 1 m <br />or more in places; additional testing warranted <br />• Non-site 16 probes @ 10 m intervals in one positive probe (I flake), probe line on TI terrace, <br />one transect probes to 160-180 curbs, base of Holocene sediments not <br />reached; additional testing warranted <br />investigations aze to assist in describing the Holocene sediment history of the project azea, with <br />emphasis on identification of deposits with archaeological potential and description of the <br />sedimentological history of those deposits. Of particulaz concern aze the alluvial and colluvial <br />valley floor sediments in Lorencito Canyon and the other major drainages, since archaeological <br />investigations indicate that features and artifacts aze fairly common in these deposits but difficult <br />to find due to the well-sealed nature of the deposits, lack of ground visibility, and the depth of <br />the deposits. <br />Ittitial results of an eight-day field session suggest that there aze Quaternary sediments <br />young enough to yield buried cultural material within the boundaries of the proposed mine. <br />These consist of remnants of three alluvial terraces in the arroyo drainages, colluvium intercalated <br />with and deposited on the terraces, and colluvial sediments mantling higher elevation structural <br />benches. The potential of these landforms to yield buried cultural materials differs according to <br />their age. <br />Relative age-dating of pedogenic properties (Birkeland 1984; Birkeland et al. 1991; <br />. McFaul et al. 1994) and comparisons with other dated landforms in the Purgatoire River drainage <br />(McFaul and Reider 1990; McFaul 1990) suggests that the lower two terraces have the highest <br />