My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE65938
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE65938
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:11:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:06:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/23/2001
Doc Name
NEWSPAPER CLIPPING
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. .~ ..... .... ... .ra o,,, tea.., oYea <br />- • <br />Figure 3. Cattomvood xesponses <br />over flit mining uife[VaI velBLLl <br />change in groundwater leael. Syrtt <br />boll rtpresen[ averages for geomor- <br />phic surfaces (surtaca) widen each <br />transectas fogows: ~ = 1, O = 2, <br />t = S, ~ = 4,. Control transecu 1 <br />and 4 axe always solid, mining af- <br />(ecmd ~~~~ 2 and 3 are open 0 <br />signifimxtdy different than the <br />pooled mnrrott All values are based <br />on the difference between measuro- <br />mend at the end of the pretxvning <br />growing season, 1991, and the end <br />of the growing eeawn in 1994. Stem <br />increment u thus a titres-year mal <br />and branch increment is athree- <br />year mal as a percentage of a prem- <br />ising duce-year mtaL Growth re <br />apoxtses aPPNonly m trees that <br />survived the entire rxrining pcxiod. <br />€ ~ <br />U <br />0 <br />LL <br />a1 -10 <br />a 'n0 <br />m <br />U -W <br />ett:a~i aKtJ <br />Cottonwood ResponseTo Water Table Declines <br />• xso Stem Increment <br />• E <br />m 100 <br />~.7~ . a <br />i1 ~ 150 <br />e °E 1 a <br />$ Gowri Volume U 700 d ~ i <br />s S0 <br />`, <br />tao f <br />n ~ • <br />m n <br />t <br />N w Survivorship <br />~ ~ <br />e 8 <br />o <br />-75 -1A -OS 0.0 <br />~ O l i i r <br />g eD <br />Branch Increment r <br />c 70 <br />~ W i o <br />E ~~ <br />i e ~ <br />m 50 <br />t[ o° <br />5 ~ °~ <br />1 ~Q <br />OS -i5 -1.0 -0.5 OA <br />CFlange in Groundwater Elevation (m) <br />logistic regression of the probability of tree survival in <br />1998 against the prior yeaz's change in live crown <br />wlume (Figure 5) was highly significant (-2 log likeli- <br />hood =270, XZ with 1 dJ= 292, P < 0.0001). Trees with <br />increases or no prior year change in the live crown <br />wlume had negligible motraliry (probability ofaurvival <br />>97rYo), wheirav ¢ees with prior year declines in canopy <br />volume of?90 had survival probabilities less than 0.5. <br />The most immediate visible responses of Populvs to <br />rapid initial water table destines z] m at tansect 9 <br />included leaf desiccation and branch dieback within <br />three weeks. This response was reflected in decreases in <br />live crown volume that persisted as progressive year-co- <br />year declines For surviving aces over the study period <br />(1991-1994). In contrast, live crown wlume values for <br />trarrsect 2 and con¢ol transects 1 and 4 remained <br />essentially unchanged through the same period. <br />Oveiall pre- and postsnitsing differences in branch <br />sad stem growth contained considerable year-to-year <br />variation. For example, at the crassest moldy heavily <br />affected by mining (transect 3), branch growth in 199$ <br />on surviving ¢ees increased relative m the premising <br />average; however, growth declined sharply in 1999 sad <br />1994. Sy comparison, branch growth remained below <br />premising averages ac the other «ansects (transects 1, <br />2, and 4) from 1992-1994. On the other hand, stem <br />growth for surviving ¢ees at ¢ansect 9 averaged 1 <br />ant/yr in the first~two yeas after mining (1992-1998) <br />and increased to 10 em1/yr in 1994. In contrast, <br />consistently higher ales of annual stem growth were <br />observed at the other tansects, ranging from 19 to 56 <br />CIn1/yr at tranaects 2 and 4, respectively. <br />DISCUSSIOfI <br />Drought Response Patterns of Riparian <br />Populusto Wa[erTable Declines <br />I~oo7 <br />353 <br />OS <br />Our experiaaental results demonstrated that Popultu <br />forests are vulnerable w relatively small declines in <br />shallow alluvial water tables. Sustained, gradual water <br />table declines of 50.5 m in the alluvial sands of Coal <br />Creek were associated with reduced branch growth but <br />]itde mortality; abrupt declines ?1 m produced leaf <br />desiccation and blanch dieback within three weeks and <br />significant reductions in ]ive crown volume (Figure 4A <br />and B), stem gruwth, and 883o mortality over athree- <br />yeazperiod. Significant branch dieback, measured as a <br />reduction in live crown volume, occurred relatively <br />gtrickly following rapid water table declines at uansect 3 <br />and served as a significant predictor of ¢ce mortality in <br />the following year (Figure 5). Blanch diebark is a <br />common response of ¢ees to water s¢ess (Albertson <br />and Weaver 1945) and may enhance tree survival <br />during severe drought by reducing ¢anspirational sur- <br />face area (~immerrnan 1978, Bradford and Hsiao 1982, <br />Braame and others 1996). However, acute water avess <br />associated with rapid water table declines can induce <br />cavitation of xylem vessels and subsequent branch <br />dieback (Tyree and others 1994). Pt>ptelus spp. are <br />particularly vulnerable [o losses in hydaWic conductiv- <br />ity resulting from drought-induced cavitation of xylem <br />vessels, and cavitation has been implicated in the <br />decline of Populm forests dovms¢eam of some dams <br />and diversions (Tyree and others 1994). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.