Laserfiche WebLink
• i <br />the reclamation bond will need to cover reclaiming this area. Reclamation will be in the form of <br />the addition of topsoil and seeding. Sierra has not included any funds for this in the reclamation <br />plan estimate. There will be no activity on this path until the reconstruction of the sediment pond <br />has begun. Once the reconstruction is complete, the funds earmarked in the reclamation bond for <br />sediment pond reconstruction can be allocated and should be sufficient to cover the cost of <br />reclaiming the path. The path is approximately 400 feet long by 12 feet wide, or 4,800 square feet <br />(1/10 acre). The estimate for sediment pond cleanout is $4,800, providing $1 per square foot for <br />reclamation of the path. The estimate for reclamation on other portions of the property is $0.60 <br />per square foot. <br />Exhibit G - Proof of Rieht to Enter <br />Your paragraph one: I have added the language of the stipulation (regazding Sierra's use of the <br />White Marble No. 2 Placer Claim) agreed upon between Sierra and the Attorney General's Office <br />to the permit document. Sierra holds a First Deed of Trust on WM2 and CYMC has defaulted. <br />Accordingly, under the terms of the First Deed of Trust, Siena has the right to enter and take <br />possession of WM2. The language in your pazagraph might be construed to restrict Sierra from <br />touching WM2 in any way. This language is more restrictive than Siena's rights under the First <br />Deed of Trust. Siena can comply with the restrictions listed in your paragraph so long as such <br />restrictions do not preclude Sierra from exercising any rights it has under the Fvst Deed of Trust. <br />In practical terms, this means that Siena may use existing roads for transport of its equipment <br />across WM2, but it may not perform activitues that might be considered mining operations such <br />as excavation or dumping of waste material. I beheve this is consistent with the language in the <br />stipulation. I believe Cheryl Lindon of the AG's office has seen copies of the First Deed of Trust <br />and the Default Judgment against CYMC. If you need copies, I can provide them to you. <br />Exhibit L -Permanent Man-made Structures <br />Your paragraph one: Your No. 1: Sierra's operation will not depend on stabilizing work carried <br />out in the azeas described in order for the operation to reach its full potential. Your No. 2: Siena <br />is not the responsible party to carry out such stabilization work. Your No. 3: Sierra will not re- <br />affect this area with its operations. In general, Siena would like to see some stabilization of the <br />waste slope in this azea, but only because there may be minor movement of the material onto <br />neighboring property in the future. However, Sierra's operations within the affected area will not <br />add to the problem and Sierra's operations do not depend on the stabilization of this slope. <br />Thank you for all of your work on this application. I firmly believe your input has helped Sierra <br />focus on the issues that need to be addressed so that the Yule Quarry operation can be successful. <br />Regazds, <br />G~ 5's-f~G <br />Rex E. Loesby <br />President <br />