Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lJ <br />4. The sediment ponds were deleted from the mining plan <br />because it was discovered that the water percolates through the <br />soil. <br />5. Yes. <br />EXHIBIT E - RECLAMATION PLAN <br />1. We appreciate your suggestion and will reconsider our plan <br />now that we have your expertise. <br />2. We appreciate the thought and consideration that went into <br />this suggestion. Thank you. <br />3. A ditch three or four inches deep running laterally across <br />the slope will be constructed by blade when and where needed to <br />prevent erosion. <br />EXHIBIT F - RECLAMATION PLAN MAP <br />1. Drainage ways will be continued down the slopes. Riprap <br />will be placed along the courses on the reclaimed slopes to <br />prevent erosion. <br />EXHIBIT G - WATER INFORMATION <br />1. The operator does not plan to affect the surface water or <br />ground water. Several dikes were erected along the drainage <br />courses many years ago. It is assumed they were for either <br />erosion control or stock watering. The area being described as a <br />"pond area" is obviously in the location of one of those dikes. <br />EXHIBIT L - RECLAMATION COSTS <br />1. Approximately 32 percent of Stage 6 and 43 percent of Stage <br />7 will be disturbed and unreclaimed at the point of maximum <br />disturbance. This would be 2.6 acres and 2.4 acres respectively <br />for a total of 5.0 acres +/-, At a cost of $115 per acre (for <br />seed and drilling), the additional reclamation costs would be <br />$575, bringing the maximum cost of reclamation to approximately <br />$99,000. We recommend bond be set at $99,000. <br />2. The chart shows total acres involved if mining and <br />reclamation go to completion. The greatest disturbance is when <br />Stage 5 is 65 percent complete. The acreage involved thus <br />becomes 47.3 x 65~ = 30.7 +/- acres. The correct acreage is in <br />fact 52.69 +/-, <br />