My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE65376
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE65376
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:11:11 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:50:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2005033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/7/2006
Doc Name
Response to adequacy review
From
WSI Weiland Inc.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The hydraulic conductivity of alluvial sediments in the Denver Basin range from <br />100 to 2000 ft/day. The State Engineer recommends that we use 600 ft/day in <br />this area. <br />The transmissivity is the product of aquifer thickness and conductivity so where <br />the gravel is 10 feet thick the transmissivity is 6000 sq.ft/day. The specific yield is <br />assumed to be 0.20 and the storage coefficient for confined conditions is 1 E-5. <br />2.4. Input Parameters <br />2.4.1. Hydraulic Conductivities <br />Hydraulic conductivity for the lower gravel layer was set to 600 ft/day (Sy=0.2). <br />The value has been accepted by the Colorado Office of the State Engineer as a <br />representative value for gravel deposits on the Big Thompson River. The <br />conductivity of reclamation fill materials to be placed after mining is completed <br />was set to 10 ft/day (Sy=0.1). The clay liner in the model has a hydraulic <br />conductivity of 0.003 ft/day as is required by the State Engineer. <br />2.4.2. Big Thompson River <br />The Big Thompson River is simulated through application of a Constant Head <br />boundary in MODFLOW. <br />The Big Thompson River has an average width of 10 ft of through the model <br />domain. The riverbed and banks were surveyed for a separate Floodplain <br />Modeling effort by WI. This river survey data was used as the basis for the river <br />water elevations and constant head elevations. <br />2.4.3. West Pit Dewatering <br />Dewatering of the pit is simulated through application if the DRAIN package in <br />MODFLOW. Each model cell on the perimeter of the pit is simulated as a.drain <br />cell. Mining will proceed in two phases: first a west pit will be mined and <br />reclaimed then an east pit will be mined and reclaimed. <br />Mining will ultimately result in the west pit fully excavated with dewatering <br />trenches surrounding the toe of pit excavation. In the simulation, the elevation of <br />the drain was set at 1.5 feet above the bottom of the pit wall. The dewatering <br />drain yields approximately 900 gpm. These values are consistent with <br />observations of seepage faces (2 to 4 feet above toe of wall) and seepage yields <br />for other similar gravel pits in the area. <br />Gardels Pit <br />Revised Groundwater Modeling Report <br />3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.