Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />specifically includes recreation and wildlife uses. These land uses are not mentioned in the <br />reclamation plan. These deficiencies in the reclamation plan give sufficient grounds to deny the <br />application under §34-32.5-115(4)(g), C.R.S.. <br />Conclusion <br />Numerous procedural and substantive deficiencies in the application prevent a permit <br />from issuing. These deficiencies also merit denial of the permit application. The most <br />reasonable course of action is for the applicant to withdraw the application until such time as <br />these serious issues can be satisfactorily resolved. Should this action not be taken by the <br />applicant, the DMG is encouraged to seek to minimize expenditure ofpublic and private time, <br />energy and resources by removing this application from consideration or rejecting the permit at <br />the eazliest possible stage in the permitting process. <br />Respectfully Submitted this 16th Day of December, 1997. <br />Rick and Lynda Emerson, <br />Rick and Susie Bell, and <br />Betty and Buck Moms <br />by Counsel <br />~~ <br />Travis E. Stills CO Bar # 27509 <br />P.O. Box 1102 <br />Durango, CO 81302 <br />970 2>9-8046 <br />fax 970 259-7514 <br />9 <br /> <br />