My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE65228
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE65228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:11:04 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:46:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003037
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/1/2004
Doc Name
Statement of Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration
From
Susan L. McIntosh P.C.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3-01-2004 2:21 PM FROM ROYAL MAIL SERVICE 50d+622+0688 <br />'02/1212004 1„27 9702495683 <br />WFSTWAT[R ASSOCIATES <br />is E~f the George property not iVES~'. As stated previously, the Metcalf Pzt is <br />hydro greatly differem, they began mining at [he':im of the mesa lowering the <br />groan er, table as they cxrzvated back. The ground water is also drained by the draw <br />to the y~est of the Metcalf Pit. To state that tw water has eves been seen emanating from <br />the hi ~lh wall implies the author has been watching the wall and that no water has e°~er <br />been 1 emanating from the wall. Were all Western employees comscted that ever <br />work °~ on the project? <br />P. 8 <br />PAGE 05106 <br />Page , Paragrapb l: 'ii backhoe excarwtio hole was carxlrrcted br the onerntor trc the <br />» o ! in em S temb 2003 wht e ' on w i ll <br />~ip~e war dugto a tora~denih gf'20 0 feet with rm water or sla~le er~cowtt~ <br />' e is i e in the rasa tnomsed,~ initial miniag(p~}Jess this i stranII <br />'d t wet w'IF)x a ed to this death dt~im' ioK " - Aocording <br />to th oea] dealer for John .Deere, the maximum depth the pictured Mode! 410 A backhoo <br />cool ossibly reach (without digging a large inset platform to S or 6 fees) is 15' 3". Was <br />there n inset excavated? If aot, this piece of e~uiptrrent could sot have removed <br />mat s to this depth. The current consultant was not employed at this time, hearsay. <br />Page~1, Paragraph 1: Urrited Company Pit - Is tbcre any documentation (photos, etc.) <br />of an Ia.rccavation to a depth 25 feet below the excavated 30 to 35 foot bottom of the pit? .(s <br />it po ,, ble far a front end loader to "dig" a test pit 25 feet in the large boulders of Spring <br />Page 1, Paragraph 2: 'I2te continued reference to the Applehanz Base Product and <br />Met f. Pits. are irrclevaat, they are both located on the rim of the lasso and' excavazed <br />back to the gravels under, different hydrologic wnditions. <br />Peg ~, Paragraph 2: This emirs paragraph i s of no consequcttce t0 this application, <br />the 1 terrace is nos diiectly connected to the upper terrace nor does it rely on the <br />uppel~tetracc for recharge. The lower terrace is directly •linked to the Uncompahgre <br />Paragraph 3: "~~ree the lore terra Ha[da_rson or~rcuiQn cotttEp,~lates.trtinirg <br />,:,- Haw would this excavated pit be irrigated as before? In the past this area was <br />trigated, would this be possible? W[irtt about exuss water? Would the area have to <br />be <br />i2, Paragraph 4: "la Short. the cumttt tarsals !s that dtrri ig trriglar;OH. f ('IJ¢ r mtd <br />t OC . "The tferenee TO n0 imgatiort <br />east fthe site is incorrect, Jim Bean irrigates approximately 40 to 50 acres to the east of <br />the ~,~`oposed pit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.