My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE65228
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE65228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:11:04 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:46:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003037
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/1/2004
Doc Name
Statement of Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration
From
Susan L. McIntosh P.C.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3-01-200d 2:18PM FROM ROYAL MAIL SERVICE 50dt522t0688 P.2 <br />,; <br />+. ~ ' '~~~ <br />1 ~ ~.~4 <br />t ' <br />j;. <br />~..: <br />~r Jy. ~ ®1 <br />BEF 'THE MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD D ~ ~ <br />STA OF COLORADO <br />STA'~EMENT.OF OBJECTION TO PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION <br />IN ~~ MATTER OF THE.APPLICATION OF HAI:DORSON ANU SONS, INC., <br />FILE O. M-2003-037 <br />~~ <br />Haldorson and Sons, Inc, (Haldorson) the applicant and petitioner herein filed a <br />For Reconsideration of the Mined Land Reclamation Roard (Board) decision of <br />12, 2003, in the above referenced matter. Those entities and individuals <br />by undersigned counsel, already as a matter of record herein, respectfully <br />the Board's consideration of the Petition because it fails to meet the threshold <br />stated in Rule 2.9 re~uding newly discovered material, not available to applicant <br />prior ~ the hearing. Further, objection is made to the substance and request made in the <br />In support of the foregoing objections, the following comment and response of <br />Associates, Inc., Objector's hydrologic expert, is respectfully attached hereto, <br />herewith and submitted to the Board. <br />WHEREFORE, Objectors request that the Board deny consideration of the <br />based upon the peritioner's.failure to demonstrate compliance with the threshold <br />of Rule 2.9; and further, in the evem that the Boatd entertains the Petition, <br />request that the Board deny the Petition in its entirety and make no <br />to the Board's Aecember 12; 2003 Findings and Order. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.