Laserfiche WebLink
<~ <br />_~';, <br />energy fuels coal, inc <br />soutthfield mine <br />p. o. box 459 l 190 county road 9°_ florence, mlorado 812^ti phone (7191 784-6395 fax (719) 784-435° <br />July 3, 2001 <br />Industrial Permits and Enforcement Program <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment <br />WQCD-PE-B2 <br />4300 Cherry Creek Drive South <br />Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 <br />Attn: Carla I.enkev <br />Re: Report of Noncompliance Discharge <br />Permit No. CO 0036595 <br />Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />Dear Ms. Lenkey: <br />During the monitoring period 4/01/01 to 6/30/01, permit limitations for total iron were exceeded at <br />outfall OOIA as shown on the accompanying Discharge Monitoring Report. The pazameters exceeded <br />and date of the exceedence are listed by outfall number below. <br />Outfall Parameter(s) Exceeded Date(s) Exceeded <br />No. <br />OOl A Total Uon (30 Day Ave. & Daily Max.) 4/24/01 <br />Only two discharges occurred at Outfall OOIA during the reporting period, and both were a result of <br />stormwater runoff into the sediment pond (Pond No. I). Since the total iron in the two samples was <br />L0.8 and 0.15 mg/I respectively, both the daily max. and 30~ay parameter limitations for total iron <br />were exceeded. <br />The cause of the high total iron, which occurred in the first discharge event, was likely caused by rust <br />and corrosion in the pond discharge structure. This structure includes a 48-inch diameter emergency <br />spillway culvert at the pond that feeds into a 305 feet long, 10 inch diameter culvert, at the end of <br />which is the dischazge/sampling point. Due to dry weather conditions, the discharge system had been <br />utilized only one time in the proceeding 18 months. Unfortunately, the sample was taken with the first <br />45 minutes of the dischazge which lasted most of the day referenced above. <br />EFCI believes that there aze no conditions at the pond that could cause the high iron as found in the <br />one sample. There aze no conditions in the small watershed area that feeds the pond that have changed <br />from previous sampling periods. A review of discharge samples for the prior 5 years, a total of 15 <br />samples, indicates total iron values (ave, min, max) of 0.82, 0.03, 3.37. These results show that the <br />pond normally treats and discharges stormwater in compliance with the permit limitations with respect <br />to total iron. <br />